Brickipedia:Quality Check Group/Requests

Featured articles • Featured Article Nominations
Class 1 Articles • Class 1 Nominations
Class 2 Articles • Class 2 (future) articles • Class 2 Nominations
Class 3 Articles • Class 3 Nominations
Class 4 Articles • Class 4 Nominations
Content Improvement • Articles for Rating
Quality Check Group • QCG Member Requests

This page is for any requests to become a member of the Quality Check Group. To prevent excessive nominations, there is an edit and time requirement for the user to be eligible to make a request. The user must have made at least 100 mainspace edits, and have been on the wiki for at least one week. They should also have shown some experience in voting/successfully nominating articles for featured articles, Class 1 articles, and/or Class 2 articles. If the request is unsuccessful, the user will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date the request concluded. For a request to pass, there must be at least a +3 vote count and a 60 percent positive vote percentage. A requester may withdraw their request at any time throughout the process, but will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date of withdrawl if the overall vote score is less than zero.

How to make a request To make a request, use the following syntax: =={{u|(your username)}}, Requested ~~~~~== '''Request comments:''' (any comments here) ===Support=== ===Oppose=== ===Comments=== After one week, an admin who is also a QCG member will close the request and notify you of the result. An archive of past requests can be seen here. Please note, only members of the Quality Check Group are permitted to vote, and should use {{RG}} before signing.

Requests

ToaMeiko, Requested 19:31, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Request comments: Pretty self-explanatory why I'm requesting this — to continue to help improve the wiki. I've been doing a good job (from what I have heard) as RQM and CQM, so I figured it was worth going for QCG as well. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:31, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

1. I feel his skills in writing and identifying errors in articles, as well as the research he puts in to articles should give him this title. -NBP 20:13, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
2. Had some good ones at BM. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
3. --Berrybrick ^(Talk) 03:18, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think you've nominated many articles for a higher class, nor were they mostly for c2 or c1. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:11, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

1. I've only nominated one article here (Wikia), which was then chosen for C2 (which was what I nominated it for). At Brickimedia, I had several article nominations, where all were given what I nominated it for or higher. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:29, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

   What were the other nominations for? --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:51, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

1. Various articles I spent time editing to get them up to MoS compliance. I can't think of specific ones. The one I did here at Wikia was 30106 Ice Cream Stand. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:54, September 3, 2013 (UTC)