No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
| − | =={{u|GoldNinjaMX}}, Requested |
+ | =={{u|GoldNinjaMX}}, Requested [[User:GoldNinjaMX|<b><font size="4" face="Neutronium" color="Gold">GOLDNINJAMX </font> ,</b>]] ([[User Talk:GoldNinjaMX|Talk]]) 03:33, October 26, 2015 (UTC)== |
| + | I am already a bureaucrat and I have been on this wiki for two years. I already know how the rating system works and so why not join the group? |
||
| − | '''Request comments:''' I have been on Brickipedia for more than 2 years and I have made many articles go from low classes to higher ones. I am also well-known, have writing knowledge, and have created lots of successful themes that have gotten lots of good responses. (I know for my theme [[Custom:LEGO Legacy (Video Game)]], I created a poll and got about sixty 1's scores, but I barely got any 2's or 3's, supporting the fact the people who voted with a 1 were just trolling for fun. I think I should become admin because I believe I have done lots of great work for Brickipedia as well as many others including my friends [[User:Edward Nigma]], [[User:ToaMatau2004]], and many others. |
||
| − | + | ==Support== |
|
| − | + | ==Oppose== |
|
| − | + | ==Comments== |
|
Revision as of 03:33, 26 October 2015
Featured articles • Featured Article Nominations
Class 1 Articles • Class 1 Nominations
Class 2 Articles • Class 2 (future) articles • Class 2 Nominations
Class 3 Articles • Class 3 Nominations
Class 4 Articles • Class 4 Nominations
Content Improvement • Articles for Rating
Quality Check Group • QCG Member Requests
|
This page is for any requests to become a member of the Quality Check Group. To prevent excessive nominations, there is an edit and time requirement for the user to be eligible to make a request. The user must have made at least 100 mainspace edits, and have been on the wiki for at least one week. They should also have shown some experience in voting/successfully nominating articles for featured articles, Class 1 articles, and/or Class 2 articles. If the request is unsuccessful, the user will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date the request concluded. For a request to pass, there must be at least a +3 vote count and a 60 percent positive vote percentage. A requester may withdraw their request at any time throughout the process, but will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date of withdrawl if the overall vote score is less than zero. |
| How to make a request
To make a request, use the following syntax: =={{u|(your username)}}, Requested ~~~~~==
'''Request comments:''' (any comments here)
===Support===
===Oppose===
===Comments===
After one week, an admin who is also a QCG member will close the request and notify you of the result. An archive of past requests can be seen here. Please note, only members of the Quality Check Group are permitted to vote, and should use {{RG}} before signing. |
GoldNinjaMX, Requested GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 03:33, October 26, 2015 (UTC)
I am already a bureaucrat and I have been on this wiki for two years. I already know how the rating system works and so why not join the group?