This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.
If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.
To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.
===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Neutral====
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*
Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.
If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.
Not sure who you are, so can't vote. ~ CJC 19:48, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
Oppose
Firstly, we are moving, so we do not need any new chat moderators here. Secondly, the user is immature and only stays for really short periods of time on chat. -Legoboy 16:15, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
Not only do I not really know you, but your PM with me demonstrated inexperience with Brickipedia and its chat. You didn't understand how to set up the request, you didn't entirely understand the process of receiving the rights, and you were even ready to give out your password so that someone else could put up the nomination using your account. That last one in particular scares me, and I don't think you have enough experience yet. Sorry. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
A very new user who has yet to get familiar with the system here and prove his "trustworthyness". --Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:59, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
^That, and I didn't feel that I needed to bother taking a screenshot. So, there's no way to view the PM. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
Well, BFN might have saved the code, or can tell us what he said from memory. --Jay is Gone. 00:50, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
I can remember most of the conversation, but I don't see what further information needs to be supplied. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
What exactly he didn't know about BP or the chat. --Jay is Gone. 00:54, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
Well, he was incredibly confused about the how to submit a nomination, to the point where I had to do it for him, and while he currently understands the process of becoming a chat mod, his initial knowledge wasn't the most comforting. The latter wasn't very important/concerning, though; it was mainly the password scare and the editing troubles. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failed
The reason I want chatmod rights is because I am in chat once a day for a long time and feel that I can keep the spam, etc. down. Legofan100(talk) 02:00, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Support
# you might make a great mod Megalor (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
Changed to support. I just managed to witness him handling the IMD thing really well, and I've seen him on chat fairly frequently. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
You'd make a great chatmod just like on Poptropica Wiki!Rough Fan (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
You Mister... SHOULD DEFINETLY BE A CHATMOD! YOU ARE AWESOME!Chrisredd(Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
You deserve this! Ultimate iPad ExpertTalk 17:41, April 7, 2013 (UTC) (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
6. I support you! From Pikachu4807 —Unsigned commentbyPikachu4807 (talk • contribs). (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
You are supported by me, Thecat21792. —Unsigned commentbyThecat21792 (talk • contribs). (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
You should definetly be a chatmod... or a admin! Lighter v27029 model 25. (Must have 100 mainspace edits to vote)
Neutral
He seems to have a lot of edits, so I don't know if others would know him better than I would, but I currently haven't seen you enough to support. Sorry. -- BrickfilmNut Productions! Changed to support.
Never seen the user on chat. -Legoboy 08:21, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
He's not on chat as much as I'd like, but he handles issues fairly well. βʊʛ™Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 17:49, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Barely know this guy. --Jay is Gone. 18:10, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Oppose
You haven't been around much. --CM4Sci (talk) 02:01, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
at 2:09:00 April/7/2013, i'm on the chat, and i think this is one of the only times i have seen you on RaceLordtalk
Not on enough, often inactive, and not always mature enough for the role. --ɥɔǝzɔWe hope you enjoyed your stay at Brickipedia 02:55, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Legofan does seem like a nice user, but he only recently began coming on chat and I haven't gotten to know him very well yet. And per CM4Sci. --Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:54, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Request for closure, since I detect some not cheating but rather canvassing. I think their is some unfairness going on unless there is evidence otherwise. User:Klagoer/sig 23:09, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
I was going to say that. --Jay is Gone. 17:35, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
Closing due to canvassing (was about to post the link, then I read the comments and saw this was already found) NightblazeSaber(talk) 23:02, April 8, 2013 (UTC)
No. The user it too immature at times, does not have that great of spelling nor grammar, and will not do good with the rights. --CM4Sci (talk) 02:08, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Per CM4S, I've seen him several times on chat, he's gotten warnings for misbehaving/rulebreaking. Maybe next time - 02:13, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
You seem like a nice user, but occasional instability has me concerned. Per Dh too, though. :P -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
I'm not sure on this, the user isn't too active on chat, often inactive, or "semi-semi-active". His backgroud isn't the cleanest, either. --ɥɔǝzɔWe hope you enjoyed your stay at Brickipedia 02:54, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Per CM4S and KoN. --Berrybrick(Talk) 03:37, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
I haven't known you for very long, but from what I've seen, you haven't shown much maturity, leadership, or responsibility. My impression of you isn't that great, so you'll need to show some major improvement before I support you. --ToaMeiko (talk) 04:08, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
We usually have our chat mods be the more sophisticated type... Not to say you're not sophisticated, don't take this as an insult, but I usually trust people with good enough grammar... (Unless you're from a non-English speaking country, which I can understand.) Also, per everyone else, you have a background full of chatbans. Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time!the question is: is or is not
I'm sorry but, who are you? Creeper S (talk) 17:46, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Don't take these opposes as deeply as you are, but you're just not the moderator type. We enjoy having you here, but you tend to misbehave and occasionally act immature. Sorry, but I'm going to have to oppose. βʊʛ™Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 17:53, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
The user isn't really very mature, breaks rules, and is very new. And also, your blurb says "grow Brickipedia" but we are leaving - I don't think I've seen him edit before, either. --ɥɔǝzɔWe hope you enjoyed your stay at Brickipedia 03:28, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Edit
