Brickipedia

READ MORE

Brickipedia
m (Created page with "{{Forumheader/new|archive=}} <!-- Forums are automatically archived after 7 days of no editing. To force a forum to be archived or not to be archived, use "|archive=true" or "|ar...")
 
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Forumheader/new|archive=}}
+
{{Forumheader/new|archive=true|reason=remove Brick Reviews, Custom Wiki was decided in [[Forum:Official Friends]]}}
 
<!-- Forums are automatically archived after 7 days of no editing. To force a forum to be archived or not to be archived, use "|archive=true" or "|archive=false" -->
 
<!-- Forums are automatically archived after 7 days of no editing. To force a forum to be archived or not to be archived, use "|archive=true" or "|archive=false" -->
   
 
With [[w:c:legoreviews|Brick Reviews]] officially closed, should we remove Brick Reviews as an official friend and delete {{tl|user brickReviews}}? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:37, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 
With [[w:c:legoreviews|Brick Reviews]] officially closed, should we remove Brick Reviews as an official friend and delete {{tl|user brickReviews}}? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:37, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:Could we change it to say something like "This user reviews sets here at Brickipedia"? {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 01:39, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:: Yep, we could make a new userbox with something like that, but it'd have to be a new userbox and a new name (I'll propose one when I get the time). Also, since we now have customs, should be think about removing the customs wiki stuff too? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:19, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::: Close Brick Reviews redirect to here. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 02:26, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::::Decision at Brick Reviews was to not redirect to here. @Berrybrick: Brickipedia Reviews userbox [[BP:UP|nommed]]. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:17, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:::::Per NHL. The agreement made between NHL and I was that permission would be granted to merge all the content of Brick Reviews to Brickipedia and have all the articles blanked and replaced with a link to the corresponding review page at Brickipedia, on the one condition that the wiki wouldn't be redirected to Brickipedia. Brick Reviews has been left there as a memory. I have no problem with us removing Brick Reviews as an official friend of Brickipedia. As for the userbox, I would modify it and put something along the lines of "This user was an editor of Brick Reviews before the merge to Brickipedia." :)<br/>{{User:SKP4472/sig2}} 12:58, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::::::I guess I'd be ok keeping the userbox, although I can't really see the userbox being widely used :S {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:::::::Removed it as an official friend, if anyone does have a reason for keeping it, please feel free to keep discussing here {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:Any response about what we should do with the customs wiki? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:: Also- Brickpost has been down for (I think) about a year- maybe we should think of removing them until the site's back up? Seems a bit weird having a dead link on our main page... {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::: My offical response to this is that the BrickPost will be back relatively soon, and that there will be a version of Customs Wiki moving off with it so... yeah... --[[User:Lcawte|'''Lewis Cawte''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 22:48, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:::: Soon - as in when? Next year? Next month? Tomorrow? {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 23:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:::::Month or two... soon isn't next year ;) --[[User:Lcawte|'''Lewis Cawte''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 16:08, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::::::Ok, definitely ok with keeping Brickpost around then :) As for linking to another customs site- do we need to? (I'm not saying we don't, just asking- and I'm a bit biased when it comes to customs, so I won't be voting) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:08, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
  +
:::::::Theres still going to be one taken with the BrickPost, when I voted against moving customs here, this intention was clearly stated so meh, you guys were warned, you don't have to like it, but it'll get more attention from us... this will be the same for LEGO Stories Wiki & possibly a few other things (not Brick Reviews -.-) --[[User:Lcawte|'''Lewis Cawte''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 23:37, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
=Revivial=
  +
So, reviews is settled. Anyone have any opinions on the customs wiki? Also, I know I said that I was ok with linking to BrickPost even though it's down, but the page is now a "not found" error page, so it seems very stupid to me to advertise an error. Personally I think temporarily removing BrickPost from the main page until it's back up would be the best option (if it's ever back up- it's been longer than the intended month or two already). {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:49, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
  +
* Yeah, I'd be ok if you commented it out for now... we could of scraped together an issue two months ago, but we really want to have all the fancy stuff we planned a year ago in it for the first relaunched issues. Unfortunately, it turns out these "exam" things that I've just started doing really are time consuming... well, thats not my excuse, its Jedimca0's... and it really is his reason, I'm supposed to revise for mine, yeah... well... Also, errors should be due to YoYo Server! --[[User:Lcawte|'''Lewis Cawte''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 20:18, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:26, 13 June 2012

Forums - Brick Reviews and Custom Wiki
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page.


Comment: remove Brick Reviews, Custom Wiki was decided in Forum:Official Friends



With Brick Reviews officially closed, should we remove Brick Reviews as an official friend and delete {{user brickReviews}}? NightblazeSaber 01:37, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Could we change it to say something like "This user reviews sets here at Brickipedia"? --Berrybrick (Talk) 01:39, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Yep, we could make a new userbox with something like that, but it'd have to be a new userbox and a new name (I'll propose one when I get the time). Also, since we now have customs, should be think about removing the customs wiki stuff too? NightblazeSaber 02:19, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Close Brick Reviews redirect to here. --Czech 02:26, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Decision at Brick Reviews was to not redirect to here. @Berrybrick: Brickipedia Reviews userbox nommed. NightblazeSaber 07:17, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Per NHL. The agreement made between NHL and I was that permission would be granted to merge all the content of Brick Reviews to Brickipedia and have all the articles blanked and replaced with a link to the corresponding review page at Brickipedia, on the one condition that the wiki wouldn't be redirected to Brickipedia. Brick Reviews has been left there as a memory. I have no problem with us removing Brick Reviews as an official friend of Brickipedia. As for the userbox, I would modify it and put something along the lines of "This user was an editor of Brick Reviews before the merge to Brickipedia." :)

SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 12:58, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

I guess I'd be ok keeping the userbox, although I can't really see the userbox being widely used :S NightblazeSaber 02:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Removed it as an official friend, if anyone does have a reason for keeping it, please feel free to keep discussing here NightblazeSaber 02:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Any response about what we should do with the customs wiki? NightblazeSaber 02:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Also- Brickpost has been down for (I think) about a year- maybe we should think of removing them until the site's back up? Seems a bit weird having a dead link on our main page... NightblazeSaber 02:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
My offical response to this is that the BrickPost will be back relatively soon, and that there will be a version of Customs Wiki moving off with it so... yeah... --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 22:48, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Soon - as in when? Next year? Next month? Tomorrow? Jag 23:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Month or two... soon isn't next year ;) --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 16:08, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Ok, definitely ok with keeping Brickpost around then :) As for linking to another customs site- do we need to? (I'm not saying we don't, just asking- and I'm a bit biased when it comes to customs, so I won't be voting) NightblazeSaber 22:08, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Theres still going to be one taken with the BrickPost, when I voted against moving customs here, this intention was clearly stated so meh, you guys were warned, you don't have to like it, but it'll get more attention from us... this will be the same for LEGO Stories Wiki & possibly a few other things (not Brick Reviews -.-) --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 23:37, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Revivial

So, reviews is settled. Anyone have any opinions on the customs wiki? Also, I know I said that I was ok with linking to BrickPost even though it's down, but the page is now a "not found" error page, so it seems very stupid to me to advertise an error. Personally I think temporarily removing BrickPost from the main page until it's back up would be the best option (if it's ever back up- it's been longer than the intended month or two already). NightblazeSaber 02:49, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I'd be ok if you commented it out for now... we could of scraped together an issue two months ago, but we really want to have all the fancy stuff we planned a year ago in it for the first relaunched issues. Unfortunately, it turns out these "exam" things that I've just started doing really are time consuming... well, thats not my excuse, its Jedimca0's... and it really is his reason, I'm supposed to revise for mine, yeah... well... Also, errors should be due to YoYo Server! --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 20:18, April 4, 2012 (UTC)