mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*Per Skdhjf. Users need to take their punishment for misbehaving in chat. They need to stop whining because it is very annoying and there has been cases recently that a chatmod's buddy got banned so they immediatly get unbanned even though they need to be banned. So basically the chatmod thinks that they need to unban their buddy even though they need to be banned. {{User:Mr. Minifigure/sig}} 21:08, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
*Per Skdhjf. Users need to take their punishment for misbehaving in chat. They need to stop whining because it is very annoying and there has been cases recently that a chatmod's buddy got banned so they immediatly get unbanned even though they need to be banned. So basically the chatmod thinks that they need to unban their buddy even though they need to be banned. {{User:Mr. Minifigure/sig}} 21:08, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
*:We need more mature and responsible chat mods. {{User:Skdhjf/SigT}} 21:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
*:We need more mature and responsible chat mods. {{User:Skdhjf/SigT}} 21:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | **There wouldn't be a problem with this if everyone that made a RfR for chatmod rights got them... |
+ | **There wouldn't be a problem with this if everyone that made a RfR for chatmod rights got them... {{unsigned|Mythrun}} |
+ | *** {{C|??? This was a joke right?}} {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:06, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Remove''' the chat indefinitely. It's the only way to solve these reiterating issues. Seriously, this extension has been causing way too many problems for this wiki, and is discouraging mainspace editing on this wiki. Also, if people want to chat, there's an [[BP:IRC|IRC]] that's collecting dust. {{User:Skdhjf/SigT}} 01:41, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Remove''' the chat indefinitely. It's the only way to solve these reiterating issues. Seriously, this extension has been causing way too many problems for this wiki, and is discouraging mainspace editing on this wiki. Also, if people want to chat, there's an [[BP:IRC|IRC]] that's collecting dust. {{User:Skdhjf/SigT}} 01:41, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Per Tat. All my problems come from it. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 01:42, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
::Per Tat. All my problems come from it. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 01:42, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
* I think chat could be excellent if two things happened. 1 - you take away ChatMod from users who misuse it 3 or more times. I don't necessarily think it's bad for users to leave a message on an admins talk page if someone really is abusing their powers. The admins are the ones who really should be responsible and not complain about it (BTW, I don't think this forum is complaining :P). The second thing is, you guys are not near strict enough. You can't be because your policy isn't, but even for things in your policy you're not. You can say that admins only carry out what the community votes, but blocking and banning is something that the community should have nothing to do with that the admins do regularly, even if it's to good users with lots of edits. It seems like you hesitate on that a little because you're used to the community being involved. I think Trolling like that should only get 3 warnings, and from what I've seen it gets nearly 100s. But that's just what I think will make it work (and I do speak from some experience. SOME :P). [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
* I think chat could be excellent if two things happened. 1 - you take away ChatMod from users who misuse it 3 or more times. I don't necessarily think it's bad for users to leave a message on an admins talk page if someone really is abusing their powers. The admins are the ones who really should be responsible and not complain about it (BTW, I don't think this forum is complaining :P). The second thing is, you guys are not near strict enough. You can't be because your policy isn't, but even for things in your policy you're not. You can say that admins only carry out what the community votes, but blocking and banning is something that the community should have nothing to do with that the admins do regularly, even if it's to good users with lots of edits. It seems like you hesitate on that a little because you're used to the community being involved. I think Trolling like that should only get 3 warnings, and from what I've seen it gets nearly 100s. But that's just what I think will make it work (and I do speak from some experience. SOME :P). [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
||
+ | ** Well, seeing evidence of ChatMod being abused depends on a chatlogger (which was the whole reason why this was made :D). You can't just assume that if someone complains about another user that they're right and the person being complained about is wrong. If we had evidence of abuse, one case would be enough for me to want to remove the chatmod rights. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:06, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:06, 23 January 2012
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 21:03, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
Support- This chat is a MESS sometimes. DUCK 02:39, January 23, 2012 (UTC) Oppose. Chat is a mess if we make it one. Yes, there are people complaining about unfair blocks - we can ignore them. Nobody is forcing anyone to go on chat, and the situation really isn't that bad... every appears to be freaking out over one or two people complaining about perfectly justified bans. I have contacted the person who makes the logbot, and they say that fixing it is on their list of things to do. I say let's keep chat, and when we have the log bot, even better. If people don't want to hear about chat drama, they can choose to ignore it. ajr 03:01, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
|