In my eyes, today is a sad day. It's the day that someone believes we need a civility policy strongly enough so that they create a forum on it. The good days on this wiki are gone, but at least with this we will have the ability to remove those users who refuse to play nice with others. NightblazeSaber_(talk)  00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Vote

Adopt a civility policy

Support

1. NightblazeSaber_(talk)  00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
2. I fully agree. LEGO Lord Talk 11,600 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!
3. Skdhjf^(Talk!) 01:02, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
4. The fact that this is necessary leaves me aghast, but it's an unfortunate truth. FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:12, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
   • Oh, wait, I'm not allowed to vote since I have less than 200 mainspace edits, which makes me a person with no knowledge at all on how wikis should be managed, despite having two years of experience being an administrator. I forgot. I guess my vote doesn't count, does it? FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:18, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
5. As long as it includes language.--Berrybrick _talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 13:04, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
   • The problem being, what the @$#&% is the definition of "language?" FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:41, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
     • Bad language. Basically everything here. Do not follow if you don't want to see bad language'''Berrybrick _talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 23:21, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
       • Wait...so we're relying on that list as the absolute definitive truth? Oh, and saying "holy ****" is quite different from being rude or uncivilized. FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:13, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
6. SKP4472 Talk 13,092 Edits! Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 13:07, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
7. I'd rather call this a "Civility Guideline".  Samdo994 talk contribs  10:20, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

• I think that is a good idea. SuperSpyX Tell me your secrets You cannot hide 12:48, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. I'm not so sure that we need a civility policy. Someone can be just as rude (or worse) while being completely civil. It happens all the time in business. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group ^(Click) 19:00, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Can't we make this a guideline instead? FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:11, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, never mind. FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:11, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Use Wikipedia's civility policy

• Found here

Support

1. NightblazeSaber_(talk)  00:06, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
2. Looks good, but I guess we should shorten or rewrite it.  Samdo994 talk contribs  10:20, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

• What happened today? I guess I wasn't here. Skdhjf^(Talk!) 00:18, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't know what Nighthawk Leader is talking about. LEGO Lord Talk 11,600 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!
    • Maybe that forum Berribrick set up. What did the forum say by the way? Skdhjf^(Talk!) 00:20, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
      • Not specifically today, just the constant fights which have been going on all around the place- and it just doesn't end. NightblazeSaber_(talk)  00:30, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
      • The forum implied that "Jews" was a swear word. --Cligra 00:51, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
        • First of all, it's BerryBrick. Second of all, he was referring to when the word "Jew" is used as an insult, that was just confusing to some people. LEGO Lord Talk 11,600 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!
          • Exactly LEGO Lord, I was trying to avoid religion offense, but it unintentionally back-fired.Berrybrick _talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 13:05, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
            • Someone could have taken it as a racist quote.:P Skdhjf^(Talk!) 22:00, April 9, 2011
              • That's what BobaFett2 was thinking. LEGO Lord Talk 11,600 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!

(UTC)

• • • • • • • • • I think it wasn't wise to put that. Someone could get seriously offended.:P Skdhjf^(Talk!) 22:18, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
• If we are to make one, the best thing to do would be to use wikipedias as an influence, and not try and forge our own as that will be undoubtedly biased. - cjc 13:17, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

• I must agree with Kingcjc. Wikipedia obviously knows what they are doing. LEGO Lord Talk 11,600 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!

• When does voting end? Berrybrick _talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 11:48, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

Revival

• So, what are we going to put in the policy? NightblazeSaber_(talk)  00:04, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Below are a few points....

1. Don't call other users questionable words (freaking anon, dork, stupid, etc.) on edit summaries....
   
2. Debates on forums, talk pages, etc. that turn into arguments are not permitted.

....and more..... Skdhjf^(Talk!) 00:36, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

• • If we don't allow arguments, that could restrict our template use. (See what I did there?) FB100Z • talk • contribs 06:11, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Support! Support! Support! -Cligra Join the redlink war!
• No arguing? --Berrybrick ^(Talk) 13:20, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • I learnt this in logic... arguing is okay. Arguing simply means that you are disagreeing with someone, and that you are using reasons to back up your case (basically another word for a debate). A fight is when people start insulting each other, etc. That should not be allowed. Jag 19:06, April 8, 2012 (UTC)