Brickipedia

READ MORE

Brickipedia
Register
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
 
::::We could, but that would be too easy. -{{User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1}} 18:14, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
 
::::We could, but that would be too easy. -{{User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1}} 18:14, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Request for closure''' - Let's ask the Wikia folks to do this for us; you should always have disclaimers and stuff on the server side. [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 00:42, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Request for closure''' - Let's ask the Wikia folks to do this for us; you should always have disclaimers and stuff on the server side. [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 00:42, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
  +
* '''Support''' Maybe a second notice in [[Brickipedia:Copyrights]] would be good too. Can we put that note into the "Powered by MediaWiki" footer (used in MonoBook, I don't know if that is used in Oasis too)? {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 17:41, August 18, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:41, 18 August 2011

Forums: Index
Administration
Copyright Footer

Hey guys, just thought about it (and also Mythrun) pointed out to me that we need a copyright footer to disclose that we are not affiliated with LEGO and so forth. © Also, read this: (link) So, what should we do? Support if you support the idea, oppose if you oppose it. (Straw Poll!)

  • Support per Fair Play. Skdhjf(Talk!) 06:24, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - I suppose. - Kingcjc 09:19, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. But only if its small, and nice and discreet. - nxt 09:53, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Too many people think we work with LEGO or something, we need this settled IMO. -NBP 14:23, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Well some people seemed to believe me on chat when I said I designed the Colletable Minifigures :P - Kingcjc 20:18, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • *sigh* I'm not surprised actually... -NBP 20:25, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support We aren't affiliated with LEGO. •myk 20:20, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - My goodness people, straw polls are for minor stylistic things, not important stuff like this :P FB100Ztalkcontribs 20:27, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Request for closure. It seems we have come to a consensus. •myk 20:31, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Question - How are we going to implement this? Let's not use a JavaScript hack; maybe the Wikia staff could help us out. FB100Ztalkcontribs 20:32, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • I know the JS code. And I love...JS hacks. It's not really a "hack" ;) Skdhjf(Talk!) 20:33, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nor can it be proven by anybody as a hack... ;) YOU GO GIRL! -NBP 20:37, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • It is, actually. I wrote it for MLNWiki :3 I think it would be better to have the code included on the server side, so it will be visible to users with no JavaScript (section 508-ish compliance.) FB100Ztalkcontribs 20:38, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
It says on the fairplay page that you can't have the LEGO logo- are we planning to remove that? Jag 02:03, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
We should. Unless we ask for permission to use it. •myk 02:10, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
Can't we just claim fair use? It occurs that if LEGO wanted it removed, they would have asked wikia when they said to remove early PoP pics, etc. - Kingcjc 09:18, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
We could, but that would be too easy. -NBP 18:14, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Request for closure - Let's ask the Wikia folks to do this for us; you should always have disclaimers and stuff on the server side. FB100Ztalkcontribs 00:42, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Maybe a second notice in Brickipedia:Copyrights would be good too. Can we put that note into the "Powered by MediaWiki" footer (used in MonoBook, I don't know if that is used in Oasis too)?  Samdo994 talk contribs  17:41, August 18, 2011 (UTC)