m (rm redlink) |
|||
(46 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Forumheader/new}} |
+ | {{Forumheader/new|archive=true}} |
'''Older (but still active) parts:''' [[Forum:Customs and Reviews/Part 1|1]] |
'''Older (but still active) parts:''' [[Forum:Customs and Reviews/Part 1|1]] |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<br>I didn't even realise this existed. Did we talk about it? |
<br>I didn't even realise this existed. Did we talk about it? |
||
− | Anyway, I've just made |
+ | Anyway, I've just made "Template:Featured Custom": |
+ | <template since integrated into {{tl|Rating}}> |
||
− | {{Featured Custom}} |
||
Do you like it? I tried to make it a bit like the ratings template, which made me think, d we want a "Good Custom" or "Complete Custom"? And also, what about "Featured Review"? {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
Do you like it? I tried to make it a bit like the ratings template, which made me think, d we want a "Good Custom" or "Complete Custom"? And also, what about "Featured Review"? {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
**Per ajr. {{User:Cligra/Sig}} |
**Per ajr. {{User:Cligra/Sig}} |
||
**Agreed. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 23:40, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
**Agreed. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 23:40, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | <template since integrated into {{tl|Rating}}> |
||
− | {{Featured Review}} |
||
− | * |
+ | *"Template:Featured Review"{{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
** I'll Monobook it when I get around to it :) Although the reviews one may not need it since it would go inside the actual review... Also, would it be ok if I tinted the FA star red/green? Just worried about possible confusion between wiki FA. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 23:40, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
** I'll Monobook it when I get around to it :) Although the reviews one may not need it since it would go inside the actual review... Also, would it be ok if I tinted the FA star red/green? Just worried about possible confusion between wiki FA. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 23:40, December 1, 2011 (UTC) |
||
*** I was just about to post that :D I'll make it. [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 03:20, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
*** I was just about to post that :D I'll make it. [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 03:20, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*****Yup, like the tints. '''I'm going to revert the length changing edit, as it was meant to correspond with the infobox. If you have another reason, say, I don't especially mind.''' {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
*****Yup, like the tints. '''I'm going to revert the length changing edit, as it was meant to correspond with the infobox. If you have another reason, say, I don't especially mind.''' {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
*Quality Custom Epicness Group!! QCEG. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/PossibleXmasSig}} 03:50, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
*Quality Custom Epicness Group!! QCEG. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/PossibleXmasSig}} 03:50, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
||
− | ** I don't think we need any review groups for these namespaces- I think a simple support/oppose vote works fine for these, since we don't really have any set MoS for them, only some minumum requirements. About |
+ | ** I don't think we need any review groups for these namespaces- I think a simple support/oppose vote works fine for these, since we don't really have any set MoS for them, only some minumum requirements. About "Template:Featured Review"- I've quoted out the cat for now, because if you stick that on a page, the cat will bleed through to the central review page as well... I'll try to think of something :S {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:57, December 2, 2011 (UTC) |
== Colors for meta pages == |
== Colors for meta pages == |
||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
==What do we have left to do?== |
==What do we have left to do?== |
||
− | ===Submit Review Button=== |
+ | ===Submit Review Button (complete)=== |
* All I can see is getting some "submit your review" button in under the "reviews" heading on the review pages which would link to the page: |
* All I can see is getting some "submit your review" button in under the "reviews" heading on the review pages which would link to the page: |
||
*:<nowiki>http://lego.wikia.com/index.php?title=Review:{{PAGENAME}}/{{USERNAME}}&action=edit&preload=MediaWiki:Createplate-Review</nowiki> {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:00, January 7, 2012 (UTC) |
*:<nowiki>http://lego.wikia.com/index.php?title=Review:{{PAGENAME}}/{{USERNAME}}&action=edit&preload=MediaWiki:Createplate-Review</nowiki> {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:00, January 7, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
I think I give up on JS on wikis :) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:01, January 11, 2012 (UTC)<br/> |
I think I give up on JS on wikis :) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 01:01, January 11, 2012 (UTC)<br/> |
||
− | At work on the create button. A nasty flaw in MediaWiki required me to hardcode the preloaded content (by using <tt>$("#wpTextbox1").val("\n\n\n\n\n<!-- Write your review above, then press Publish. -->\n<noinclude>[[Category:User reviews]]</noinclude>");</tt>), since the noincludes didn't work :( [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 01:10, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | At work on the create button. A nasty flaw in MediaWiki required me to hardcode the preloaded content (by using <nowiki><tt>$("#wpTextbox1").val("\n\n\n\n\n<!-- Write your review above, then press Publish. -->\n<noinclude>[[Category:User reviews]]</noinclude>");</tt></nowiki>), since the noincludes didn't work :( [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 01:10, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
:Aaaaggh, screw it. Preload does work, I'm just stupid... [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 01:42, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
:Aaaaggh, screw it. Preload does work, I'm just stupid... [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 01:42, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> |
||
+ | /* "Submit review" button */ |
||
+ | addOnloadHook(btnSubmitReview); |
||
+ | |||
+ | function btnSubmitReview(){ |
||
+ | var inv = '<center><div style="background-color:#ddddee;border:2px outset #9999bb;text-align:center;padding:2px 5px" id="sb-rev"><a href="/index.php?title=Review:'+wgTitle+'/'+wgUserName+'&action=edit&preload=MediaWiki:Createplate-Review&redlink=1">Submit a review</a></div></center>'; |
||
+ | document.getElementById("reviewBtn").innerHTML+=inv; |
||
+ | } |
||
+ | </pre> |
||
+ | <nowiki/>:D Does this work ok for everyone? (put the code in your personal JS file, and test it somewhere by using <nowiki><div id="reviewBtn"></div> |
||
+ | </nowiki> somewhere) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:21, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | * Added to Monobook due to lack of response. Trying to get other skin working too- it was working a few days ago when I originally wrote this, but now it's not showing up... {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:37, January 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** Now works in Wikia skin. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:57, January 27, 2012 (UTC) |
||
===Idea for Recent Edits on Reviews=== |
===Idea for Recent Edits on Reviews=== |
||
Line 153: | Line 167: | ||
*** All featured stuff now complete. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
*** All featured stuff now complete. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ===Review and Inventory Tabs for Monobook=== |
+ | ===Review and Inventory Tabs for Monobook (complete)=== |
* Extra review and inventory tabs for Monobook (just putting it down on the list, not saying anyone has to do anything about it... still trying to think of a way to get it to work) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
* Extra review and inventory tabs for Monobook (just putting it down on the list, not saying anyone has to do anything about it... still trying to think of a way to get it to work) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:46, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *: I could have a go, but I would suggest (but might need FB's backing as to whether it would work) getting the ul that holds the buttons though jQuery selectors, then changing it's innerHTML. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | *:: That's actually sort of what I tried :)<br/> |
||
+ | {{C|Code removed, no longer necessary}} |
||
+ | : But of course, it didn't work :P If you did want to have a quick go at it, you're more than welcome to (although you've probably got other things to worry about than fixing a skin you don't even use :) ) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 21:49, January 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | :: As far as I know, getElementsByClassName doesn't exist...But I may be wrong. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ::: It was added to the JS API in HTML5. Some older browsers may not support it; consider using jQuery (I'm personally a MooTools fan, but jq is default on Wikia). [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 03:26, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::: Brill. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | :::: I've got 0 experience with JQuery, and if I can't get the JS working, I'd probably have a lesser chance of getting it working by using a language I don't know anything about (not saying it isn't a good idea to use it though) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 05:17, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | * Ok, took some time to have a good look at this, the following code works completely fine in my personal JS (monobook users, feel free to use, let me know if there are any bugs, etc): |
||
+ | <pre> |
||
+ | /* Add inventory, review and wiki buttons where needed */ |
||
+ | addOnloadHook(extraButtons); |
||
+ | |||
+ | function extraButtons(){ |
||
+ | if (document.getElementById("switchtabs")){ |
||
+ | var inv = '<li id="ca-inv"><a href="/index.php?title=Inventory:'+wgTitle+'" title="An inventory of the topic" accesskey="i">Inventory</a></li>'; |
||
+ | var rev = '<li id="ca-rev"><a href="/index.php?title=Review:'+wgTitle+'" title="The article\'s reviews" accesskey="r">Reviews</a></li>'; |
||
+ | var wiki = '<li id="ca-wiki"><a href="/index.php?title='+wgTitle+'" title="The topic\'s wiki entry" accesskey="w">Article</a></li>'; |
||
+ | |||
+ | switch(wgNamespaceNumber){ |
||
+ | case 0: |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=inv; |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=rev; |
||
+ | break; |
||
+ | case 114: |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=wiki; |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=rev; |
||
+ | break; |
||
+ | case 118: |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=wiki; |
||
+ | document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=inv; |
||
+ | break; |
||
+ | } |
||
+ | } |
||
+ | } |
||
+ | </pre> |
||
+ | :But when I put it into [[Mediawiki:Monobook.js]] and/or [[Mediawiki:Common.js]], nothing happens. Any ideas why? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 06:22, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Something to do with the order that the page loads? {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | :::Must have been- I put the function at the top and it all works fine now, thanks for that (no idea why it mattered though) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 06:38, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===? (complete)=== |
||
+ | Please see [[Review talk:6862 Superman vs. Power Armour Lex|here]] and [[Review talk:6864 Batmobile and the Two-Face Chase|here]]. Anybody know why? {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 21:26, January 12, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | * 6862's because it works off certain properties which should be in reviews as per the preload template and every possible guideline, but aren't in this review. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:14, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** Everything else should be ok(ish). Some things are getting changed over right now, might be a few errors here and there for a while. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 02:29, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** If you do come across any problems like that again, please let me know though, and I'll fix them as soon as I can (I hate pages with coding errors on them :D) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 05:10, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *[[Review:6863_Batwing_Battle_Over_Gotham_City]] is trying to have two 6863's when it links back to the page... {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 20:39, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **^ Just solved that, on the base page, the title included the number. {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 20:42, January 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===WIPs?=== |
||
+ | *I had an idea last night for templates for reviews and customs which are WIPs, so pretty much respective versions of [[Template:WIP]]. Except the WIP would be different from articles, it would simply mean that they are still being written/modified/whatever. It would make it easier for a reader to tell that a review is not yet finished and that a custom is still in progress and ''should'' be updated. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 02:20, January 15, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **Made some [[User: Berrybrick/Test Space|rough versions]] in my testspace. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 02:42, January 15, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *** Seems like a good idea to me, although maybe the red should be a bit lighter for the custom template? Also, the customWIP template really shouldn't be used solely as an excuse to not upload images for the theme- I still think {{tl|CustomNoImage}} should still apply even if it's marked as a WIP. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 23:46, January 15, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ****I only used what was on my custom nav template, if it needs to be changed, not a big deal. I agree about the no image thing, this is more if the MOC is a work in progress. For example: on Monday, there is a picture of a foundation. On Wednesday, there is a picture of a complete building. The template would go on that in the time lapse (or whatever that word is :P) {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 01:35, January 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *****Is customNoImage done automatically? Cause it could (and should) be. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ****** How? Detect whether something's in the infobox? Because sometimes images aren't put into the infoboxes {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 21:21, January 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ******* Yes. I was assuming they always are. Are they not...? {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ******** No. I ''usually'' fix it when I see it though. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 12:32, January 18, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | * I've lightend the color of the Custom one. You can see it on the link above (the one that says rough versions) or [[Custom:Batgirl|here]] in use. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:39, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** Can we have it the same colour as the "this article describes a custom..." one? I think that would look nice together. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | *** I didn't think of that. I'll probably change it, if I remember. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 19:49, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **** Okay, how about now? You'd probably want the border changed to red, but I'm not sure how to do that {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 20:47, January 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***** I've updated the version in your userspace, copying the code from the the "this article describes a custom..." one. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ******Okay. Thank you. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 19:59, January 24, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ******* Just a suggestion- maybe we could use the green from the current WIP template, and have a light blue for wiki WIP templates? I honestly don't mind either way though. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:30, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ******** Assuming you mean reviews by that? {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ********* Yeah (sorry) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:11, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *When can these be enabled? I've seen [[Template:WIP]] used on a few custom pages recently, and the people who add them seem to think they are an excuse for not having two valid pages to link to or no image. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 23:53, January 28, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ** Added to {{tl|WIP}} (uses namespace to detect which notice to use, examples- [[Custom:The_World_of_Darth_henry|customs]], [[Review:6860_The_Batcave/Legosuperheroesfan|reviews]], and the normal one's still normal). Let me know if any changes need to be made, I had to change the custom one slightly due to {{tl|NotificationBox}} causing problems with the code. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:24, January 29, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===User categories for customs=== |
||
+ | * Allow them, don't allow them, or work on a semantic thing so they can generate lists without a category? |
||
+ | ** I would go for the Semantic option- it's much cleaner, and we won't have hundreds of categories just so each user is happy. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 05:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***Yeah, semantic for that reason. -<span style="background-color:purple;">[[User:King of Nynrah|<span style="color:gold;">'''King of Nynrah'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:King of Nynrah|<span style="color:gold;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> </span> 07:45, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **** Bit of a coincidence getting a comment here since I just made the template ;) I've made {{tl|CustomsProfile}}- it's a profile which shows your list of customs. It addresses the issues at [[#User_Categories.3F]] by using wildcards, so you can even say "{{u|King of Nynrah}} and {{u|Berrybrick}}" in a template (for a combined theme or whatever) and it will come up in both their profiles (note that semantic takes it as "<nowiki>[[User:King of Nynrah|King of Nynrah]] and [[User:Berrybrick|Berrybrick]]</nowiki>"). See [[Template_talk:CustomsProfile|here]] as an example (using Berrybrick because he was the first person with customs I came across). If you want to test your own username right now, you'll probably have to save each of your customs pages without any changes or wait, as it usually takes the servers a few hours to update. So... ok to use this and delete any individual user cats we have? {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:57, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***** Is there (going to be) one of these for reviews? And could we make featured customs/reviews bold? (I could do these but seeing as you're doing more customy stuff I'll let you. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | ****** {{tl|ReviewerProfile}} (you can do <nowiki>{{User:<username>/ReviewerProfile|list=1}}</nowiki> to bring up the list of reviews (and bolded FR/FC count) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 22:11, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ******* I'd be in favouf of this mandatorily replacing custom user templates, my I don't mind ''that'' much. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
Latest revision as of 01:07, 29 September 2012
Brickipedia:Featured Custom.
Anyway, I've just made "Template:Featured Custom": <template since integrated into {{Rating}}> Do you like it? I tried to make it a bit like the ratings template, which made me think, d we want a "Good Custom" or "Complete Custom"? And also, what about "Featured Review"? - nxt
<template since integrated into {{Rating}}>
Colors for meta pagesOne problem I've been noticing is that meta-pages about reviews and customs (e.g. Brickipedia:Featured Review) are still colored blue, since they aren't in the appropriate namespaces. There are three plausible ways around this:
I'm thinking that #3 would be the cleanest. Thoughts? FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:49, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
{{StarTable}}
(normal text to see what it looks like on the background)
NightblazeSaber 04:35, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
Set numbers for customsShould customs ever be given fictional set numbers? FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:50, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] -4499 days left until Christmas! 07:30, December 9, 2011 (UTC) Notes
User Categories?Should we have things like this? Berrybrick 00:40, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
|creator=aaawill produce a field that appears with the output text as: aaa. That way the semantic stuff will work as well. I don't know, it's up to people running the customs stuff I guess as to what you want to do, as long as the cats don't interfere with the wiki's cat structure it shouldn't be a problem, but displaying the results really isn't very good with categories, and semantic saves creating categories for every user. NightblazeSaber 03:28, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
Creating Review pages that don't have reviews
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] -4499 days left until Christmas! 08:52, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] -4499 days left until Christmas! 09:14, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
TiesWhat should we do when there is a tie for the month's featured custom/review? --Berrybrick (Talk) It's a Christmas miracle, Mr. Freeze! 21:16, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic Lists on Review Pages
What do we have left to do?Submit Review Button (complete)
function submitReviewButton(){ btn=document.getElementsByClassName("reviewButton"); btn.innerHTML="<a href=\"http://lego.wikia.com/index.php?title="+wgPageName+"/"+wgUserName+"&action=edit&preload=MediaWiki:Createplate-Review\">Submit a review</a>" } I think I give up on JS on wikis :) NightblazeSaber 01:01, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
/* "Submit review" button */ addOnloadHook(btnSubmitReview); function btnSubmitReview(){ var inv = '<center><div style="background-color:#ddddee;border:2px outset #9999bb;text-align:center;padding:2px 5px" id="sb-rev"><a href="/index.php?title=Review:'+wgTitle+'/'+wgUserName+'&action=edit&preload=MediaWiki:Createplate-Review&redlink=1">Submit a review</a></div></center>'; document.getElementById("reviewBtn").innerHTML+=inv; } :D Does this work ok for everyone? (put the code in your personal JS file, and test it somewhere by using <div id="reviewBtn"></div> somewhere) NightblazeSaber 07:21, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
Idea for Recent Edits on Reviews
Featured Review icons (complete)
Review and Inventory Tabs for Monobook (complete)
(Code removed, no longer necessary)
/* Add inventory, review and wiki buttons where needed */ addOnloadHook(extraButtons); function extraButtons(){ if (document.getElementById("switchtabs")){ var inv = '<li id="ca-inv"><a href="/index.php?title=Inventory:'+wgTitle+'" title="An inventory of the topic" accesskey="i">Inventory</a></li>'; var rev = '<li id="ca-rev"><a href="/index.php?title=Review:'+wgTitle+'" title="The article\'s reviews" accesskey="r">Reviews</a></li>'; var wiki = '<li id="ca-wiki"><a href="/index.php?title='+wgTitle+'" title="The topic\'s wiki entry" accesskey="w">Article</a></li>'; switch(wgNamespaceNumber){ case 0: document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=inv; document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=rev; break; case 114: document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=wiki; document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=rev; break; case 118: document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=wiki; document.getElementsByClassName("pBody")[0].getElementsByTagName("ul")[0].innerHTML+=inv; break; } } }
? (complete)Please see here and here. Anybody know why? --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:26, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
WIPs?
User categories for customs
|