Alright. We haven't really given a definite rating to Date articles (I.e January 11), I've just been seeing most of them rated Class 4, when they really look Complete to me. (I mean, how much more information does a Date article need?) I've proposed these requirements for a Date articles to be "Complete". Share your thoughts and we'll have a vote on it. Skdhjf(Talk!) 18:03, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
Article must have a Calendar template.
A short description of the Day/Month.
Events/What Happened section
See Also (Wikipedia link)
This criteria makes sense to me. We should also define completeness for list articles... ajr 19:58, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
And for part articles, as said in previous forums. - nxt 17:47, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
I agree.
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 20:57, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
If we were going to rate these articles, I think an MoS for dates would need to be established. Tatooine's criteria above seems to be good enough to me, but I think we should at least decide whether to have "Events" or "What Happened" as the main heading. Personally I think for dates and lists, we could have a separate rating scheme- two classes- either complete or incomplete. NightblazeSaber 05:36, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
