No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-<!-- --> +\n)) |
||
(41 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Forumheader|Administration}} |
+ | {{Forumheader|Administration Archive}} |
+ | {{archive |
||
+ | |result=to re-open administrator and bureaucrat nominations |
||
+ | |content= |
||
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, we should re-open them (the nominations). {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 01:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
:Yes, we should re-open them (the nominations). {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 01:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
I say we go with what ajr said and you can just turn down nominations when you have enough but not require a forum to be opened every time.{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 19:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
I say we go with what ajr said and you can just turn down nominations when you have enough but not require a forum to be opened every time.{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 19:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Woke up this morning , my ears were burning.... I agree with opening up nominations and keeping them open. [[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 22:12, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | What do you mean by your ears were burning?{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 22:30, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Lcawte is right, we don't need a lot of admins. I'm not proposing that. All that I am proposing is that we completely re-open the admin nominations. We can decide if that person needs sysop tools on a case-by-case basis. All that this really does is remove the bureaucratic inefficiency of starting this forum every time someone thinks we need another admin :/ {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 22:35, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I think there should be no more adminastrators than there alreay is. The reason being is that for one, it wont do much, and two, it would probably make things worse on Brickipedia. The reason why it would turn out worse is that there would be more and more of these forums, and people would be asking for more and more administrators and it still won't do much at all. And after a couple years the more administrators there would be the more corrupt Brickipedia will turn out. Though one new administrator should be included. I would like a voting chart. (Whoever created this forum I would like to talk to, to create a new forum for looking for MDL file creators, for I still need to decide the peice for treebeards parts.) This forum could help alot. |
||
+ | [[User:Lego lord|Lego lord]] 03:38, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :So you are saying that people will be asking to become admin all the time? The last admin was elected around 2000 pages ago. [[User:GameGear360|<font color="blue">'''GG '''</font>]][[User talk:GameGear360|<font color="black">'''360'''</font>]][[File:Gamegear.jpg||32px]] 23:24, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Hey Lego Lord, I don't think that a wiki would become corrupt with more administrators...{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 23:25, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Yeah, unless they're evil power-hungry Palpatine-type people. {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 23:29, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Fine, assuming they aren't clones of me, brickipedia won't become corrupt just by having more admins. {{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 23:30, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::Well, I'm not a clone of you. Sorry. {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 23:33, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::I have a clone... his name is Rambo. [[User:GameGear360|<font color="blue">'''GG '''</font>]][[User talk:GameGear360|<font color="black">'''360'''</font>]][[File:Gamegear.jpg||32px]] 23:36, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Voting== |
||
+ | ===Reopen admin nominations=== |
||
+ | #{{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 19:55, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 19:57, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #{{User:GameGear360/sig2}} |
||
+ | # ----- It's Magic - [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 20:06, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #{{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 21:15, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #[[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 23:17, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # Only with that condition where if your nom fails, you can't re-apply for another 2 months so we don't get flooded with annoying requests. Otherwise, neutral{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:03, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #:We can do that. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 03:07, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 13:44, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===Induct one more admin=== |
||
+ | # --[[User:Lcawte|'''<span style="color:black;">Lewis Cawte</span>''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 07:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | <s># Isn't "re-opening" and "inducting one/two admins" the same? {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 15:58, August 25, 2010 (UTC)</s> |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===Induct two more admins=== |
||
+ | ===Do nothing=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Result== |
||
+ | I have re-opened the administrator requests. Feel free to nominate someone :) {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 15:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | =More administrators Episode II: More bureaucrats?= |
||
+ | * I was wondering what people thought about re-opening bureaucrat requests, with the stipulation that the user must be an administrator to request the right. Or, having an "election" for existing admins to be b'crats. The reasons being, if there is only one active b'crat, and that b'crat suddenly disappears (although that b'crat is not planning on doing so), then there won't be anyone around to hand out user rights, and you'd have to go through staff requests to get another one. B'crat really isn't that different to admin- you just tick a box every so often when you're told to over at [[Brickipedia:User rights/Requests]]. |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===Reopen bureaucrat nominations=== |
||
+ | #{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 08:17, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #----- It's Magic - [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 09:43, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #Once again, if we feel that we have too many, we can just oppose requests per that. I think that the bureaucrat right should be nomination-only, though. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 13:42, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 13:44, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #It wont hurt to add another... [[User:GameGear360|<font color="blue">'''GG '''</font>]][[User talk:GameGear360|<font color="black">'''360'''</font>]][[File:Gamegear.jpg||32px]] 13:47, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #Two seems like a good number{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 14:07, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #{{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 20:34, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #Yep. -[[User:Mariofighter3|<font color="red">'''Mariofighter3: '''</font>]][[User talk:Mariofighter3|<font color="#407B38 ">''' Brickfliming now '''</font>]][[special:contributions/Mariofighter3|<font color="#7FD2EE">''' in session!'''</font>]] 00:08, August 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # [[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 00:11, August 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:Agent Fuse/sig}} 08:40, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ===Induct one more bureaucrat=== |
||
+ | ===Induct two more bureaucrats=== |
||
+ | ===Do nothing=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | # --[[User:Lcawte|'''<span style="color:black;">Lewis Cawte</span>''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 17:16, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | -------- |
||
+ | * Would it be ok to close this midnight August 29 UTC? The current vote looks pretty one-sided {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 08:08, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Yeah, fine. There would need to be nine more votes to change it, and most people have voted. {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 08:30, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:34, 12 April 2012
Forums: Index → |
|
→ More administrators? |
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was to re-open administrator and bureaucrat nominations
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. ajr 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 01:38, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. I think two would actually be better because we have gotten so many new people recently. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:15, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Oh yeah I forgot about that. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:42, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
True BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:42, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Ajraddatz has a point. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 00:45, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 12:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
If you want that then it's not an election, it's just saying here Gladiatoring, be an admin. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
It's the school year that's a problem. And yes some do sit there for weeks. During the school year, when people are busy a large portion of the day, it makes more sense to have another admin who can be on at different times. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:50, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
I say we go with what ajr said and you can just turn down nominations when you have enough but not require a forum to be opened every time. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
What do you mean by your ears were burning? BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 22:30, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Hey Lego Lord, I don't think that a wiki would become corrupt with more administrators... BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 23:25, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 23:30, August 24, 2010 (UTC) VotingReopen admin nominations
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:57, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Induct one more admin
Induct two more adminsDo nothingResultI have re-opened the administrator requests. Feel free to nominate someone :) ajr 15:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC) More administrators Episode II: More bureaucrats?
Reopen bureaucrat nominations
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 14:07, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 08:40, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Induct one more bureaucratInduct two more bureaucratsDo nothing
|