m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-<!-- --> +\n)) |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Forumheader|Administration}} |
+ | {{Forumheader|Administration Archive}} |
+ | {{archive |
||
+ | |result=to re-open administrator and bureaucrat nominations |
||
+ | |content= |
||
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, we should re-open them (the nominations). {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 01:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
:Yes, we should re-open them (the nominations). {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 01:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Line 67: | Line 70: | ||
#[[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 23:17, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
#[[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 23:17, August 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
# Only with that condition where if your nom fails, you can't re-apply for another 2 months so we don't get flooded with annoying requests. Otherwise, neutral{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:03, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
# Only with that condition where if your nom fails, you can't re-apply for another 2 months so we don't get flooded with annoying requests. Otherwise, neutral{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:03, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
||
− | :We can do that. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 03:07, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
+ | #:We can do that. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 03:07, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
+ | # {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 13:44, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
===Induct one more admin=== |
===Induct one more admin=== |
||
# --[[User:Lcawte|'''<span style="color:black;">Lewis Cawte</span>''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 07:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
# --[[User:Lcawte|'''<span style="color:black;">Lewis Cawte</span>''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 07:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
||
− | # Isn't "re-opening" and "inducting one/two admins" the same? {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 15:58, August 25, 2010 (UTC) |
+ | <s># Isn't "re-opening" and "inducting one/two admins" the same? {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 15:58, August 25, 2010 (UTC)</s> |
===Induct two more admins=== |
===Induct two more admins=== |
||
===Do nothing=== |
===Do nothing=== |
||
+ | |||
− | <!-- --> |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Result== |
||
+ | I have re-opened the administrator requests. Feel free to nominate someone :) {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 15:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
=More administrators Episode II: More bureaucrats?= |
=More administrators Episode II: More bureaucrats?= |
||
Line 83: | Line 92: | ||
#----- It's Magic - [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 09:43, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
#----- It's Magic - [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 09:43, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
#Once again, if we feel that we have too many, we can just oppose requests per that. I think that the bureaucrat right should be nomination-only, though. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 13:42, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
#Once again, if we feel that we have too many, we can just oppose requests per that. I think that the bureaucrat right should be nomination-only, though. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 13:42, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:Samdo994/sig1}} 13:44, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
+ | #It wont hurt to add another... [[User:GameGear360|<font color="blue">'''GG '''</font>]][[User talk:GameGear360|<font color="black">'''360'''</font>]][[File:Gamegear.jpg||32px]] 13:47, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #Two seems like a good number{{User:BobaFett2/sig2}} 14:07, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #{{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 20:34, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | #Yep. -[[User:Mariofighter3|<font color="red">'''Mariofighter3: '''</font>]][[User talk:Mariofighter3|<font color="#407B38 ">''' Brickfliming now '''</font>]][[special:contributions/Mariofighter3|<font color="#7FD2EE">''' in session!'''</font>]] 00:08, August 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # [[User:Gladiatoring|Gladiatoring]] 00:11, August 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:Agent Fuse/sig}} 08:40, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
===Induct one more bureaucrat=== |
===Induct one more bureaucrat=== |
||
===Induct two more bureaucrats=== |
===Induct two more bureaucrats=== |
||
===Do nothing=== |
===Do nothing=== |
||
+ | |||
− | <!-- --> |
||
+ | |||
+ | # --[[User:Lcawte|'''<span style="color:black;">Lewis Cawte</span>''']] ([[User talk:Lcawte|Talk]] - [[w:User:Lcawte/Contact|Contact]]) 17:16, August 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | -------- |
||
+ | * Would it be ok to close this midnight August 29 UTC? The current vote looks pretty one-sided {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 08:08, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Yeah, fine. There would need to be nine more votes to change it, and most people have voted. {{User:Captain Jag/sig}} 08:30, August 28, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:34, 12 April 2012
Forums: Index → |
|
→ More administrators? |
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was to re-open administrator and bureaucrat nominations
Hello everyone, after looking around a bit I think that Brickipedia could benefit from one or two more administrators. This forum is also brought on by my attempting to get article comments enabled again, after which we could use more admins. There isn't much else to say, so please just say if you think that we should have a couple more admins or not. If everyone is in agreement, then I will re-open the admin nominations section of the user rights requests page. I think that these should also stay open, even if we oppose every request with the reasoning that we have enough admins. That way we can get the best people, in my opinion. Anyways, please discuss. ajr 01:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 01:38, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. I think two would actually be better because we have gotten so many new people recently. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:15, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Oh yeah I forgot about that. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:42, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
True BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:42, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Ajraddatz has a point. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 00:45, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 12:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
If you want that then it's not an election, it's just saying here Gladiatoring, be an admin. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
It's the school year that's a problem. And yes some do sit there for weeks. During the school year, when people are busy a large portion of the day, it makes more sense to have another admin who can be on at different times. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 16:50, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
I say we go with what ajr said and you can just turn down nominations when you have enough but not require a forum to be opened every time. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
What do you mean by your ears were burning? BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 22:30, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Hey Lego Lord, I don't think that a wiki would become corrupt with more administrators... BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 23:25, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 23:30, August 24, 2010 (UTC) VotingReopen admin nominations
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 19:57, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Induct one more admin
Induct two more adminsDo nothingResultI have re-opened the administrator requests. Feel free to nominate someone :) ajr 15:20, August 26, 2010 (UTC) More administrators Episode II: More bureaucrats?
Reopen bureaucrat nominations
BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 14:07, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 08:40, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Induct one more bureaucratInduct two more bureaucratsDo nothing
|