No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Theme field? {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 23:56, February 13, 2012 (UTC) |
:Theme field? {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 23:56, February 13, 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Yeah, I guess so... {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
::Yeah, I guess so... {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | :NXT: I know exactly how you feel with the = vs ==, I hate it when that happens :) Umm idea sounds good, but it isn't replacing the review pages is it? couldn't you just use ifexist- if the review page exists, show it, if it doesn't, say it isn't a valid topic? Sorry if I've completely missed the point, reading this very quickly. {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:50, February 16, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:50, 16 February 2012
If the namespace is a review,
If the namespace is not review, then don't use it. If you don't understand the above, then I'll try to explain it further. Jag 23:40, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
If namespace == review: if page == true: if set == true: {{tl|ReviewPage}} if set == minifigure: {{tl|ReviewPage}} else: Review not valid. Then again, == is python and I think it might just be = in pseudo. Anyway, ignoring all that, seems good. - CJC 10:21, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
The only problem I can see is with the CM bit. There is currently no way of checking if a page has categories (I would really like this though), and although I could design a workaround with semantic, it would be best not to. - nxt
|