(Undo revision 1029239 by LegoRokz112 (talk) this is a closed form) |
|||
(21 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Forumheader/new|archive=}} |
+ | {{Forumheader/new|archive=true|reason=See the explanation at the bottom of the page.}} |
<!-- Forums are automatically archived after 7 days of no editing. To force a forum to be archived or not to be archived, use "|archive=true" or "|archive=false" --> |
<!-- Forums are automatically archived after 7 days of no editing. To force a forum to be archived or not to be archived, use "|archive=true" or "|archive=false" --> |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
*'''Support''' [[User:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Charge'''</font>]] [[User talk:Agent Charge|<font color="lightgrey">'''talk'''</font>]] Go Briki! 19:02, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' [[User:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Charge'''</font>]] [[User talk:Agent Charge|<font color="lightgrey">'''talk'''</font>]] Go Briki! 19:02, January 25, 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' --LUModder LUBeta Tester (I will make sig later) |
*'''Support''' --LUModder LUBeta Tester (I will make sig later) |
||
+ | *'''Support''' ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░[[User:Eagleeyedan|Eagleeyedan]]▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ |
||
+ | *'''Support''' Since we can choose it or not. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 00:49, February 7, 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Oppose == |
== Oppose == |
||
Line 111: | Line 113: | ||
:One of us (admins)(I assume)(why does it matter?)(and why am I using so many brackets?). {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
:One of us (admins)(I assume)(why does it matter?)(and why am I using so many brackets?). {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
::Yeah, it has to be an (admin)(I was wondering which admin it would be)(:P)([[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup>) |
::Yeah, it has to be an (admin)(I was wondering which admin it would be)(:P)([[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup>) |
||
− | : |
+ | :We haven't quite reached a consensus yet, if I have it correctly. We have 12 supporters versus 8 opposers; both have pretty strong points. [[Special:Contributions/75.0.177.16|75.0.177.16]] 20:07, January 26, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | |||
+ | ===What counts as a censor?=== |
||
+ | ^^^ --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 08:44, January 28, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *If you mean what censor it, then it's an image. If you mean what's censored, then that's up to the admin. [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
||
+ | **Admins don't own the wiki. What if a user disagrees with their decision? [[User:FB100Z|FB100Z]] • [[User talk:FB100Z|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FB100Z|contribs]] 22:55, February 2, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***<s>Death penalty.</s> Capital punishment. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 22:58, February 2, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ****If that happens, the People's Republic of Normal Brickipedia Users will drain the moat outside of the cabal's castle out of revenge. [[Special:Contributions/75.0.177.16|75.0.177.16]] 02:39, February 3, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *****Errm. Should we make a "list" :P |
||
+ | ******No, it's fine for an admin to do because it always optional whether you can view the word or not. :) [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
||
+ | *******That made absolutely no sense. Maybe I'm an idiot :/ [[Special:Contributions/75.0.177.16|75.0.177.16]] 18:22, February 3, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ********If we do have a word filter can we keep it at just swear words, otherwise there will be some debate as it depends on the context. Also even some swear words depend on the context. Anyway some people are going to have to use the words to decide which ones are censored --[[User:Brick bobby|Brick bobby]] 07:47, February 4, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *********My plan was to just have swear words. For the words the some people think are swear words, and some people don't, there will be an orange X instead of a red X. And don't worry, the swear words that people don't agree on definitely won't go as far as "fart" and that kind of stuff. :P [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
||
+ | **********I don't want words like crap and hell getting the orange tick, Crap simply means bad work or poop. --{{User:Crazed Penguin/spook}} 02:14, February 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **********I wasn't planning on putting those on, but if you don't want them, then you'd have to notify the admin... [[User:Drew1200|Drewlzoo]]<sup>([[User talk:Drew1200|talk]]) ([[User blog:Drew1200|blogs]])</sup> |
||
+ | *{{C|Outdent}} If this gets implemented (I hope it doesn't), red X's should be the only level. No orange or yellow or any of that weird controversial stuff (since when do we need to hide the word "idiot" from 13+?). And let's not make the red X's part of policy, only courtesy. No crap about "if you produce a red X, you will be banned for 16.8 days." [[Special:Contributions/75.2.130.125|75.2.130.125]] 02:36, February 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ---------- |
||
+ | '''closed (by request) with decision to implement on some level''' Although I've voted, I really am not worried about this as I never use chat, so feel I can look at this objectively. Obvously the word list is still to be decided, but I really can't see what the harm is in censoring some of the "higher-level" words. As far as the "freedom of speech" argument goes, it's no different to beeping out swearing on the news on tv, and if you want to see what the word is, you have that option. I would recommend that admins involved with the chat feature to work on a list "off-wiki". I don't think we really want our wiki to be at the top of a list of search results when they're typed into google (although i'm not sure that they'll have to go in a js file anyway) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:02, February 8, 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:16, 13 June 2012
Red X: Swear Words Orange X: Bad Words Yellow X: Unneeded words commonly used for spamming or trolling It is completely customizable, you can delete or add as much as you want, for example, the LMB Wiki doesn't even use the orange level right now. Here are some reasons I think it would be good:
There are many more reasons, but as I said, Brickipedia can make it block anything they want, and it's completely optional for users. They can choose to read the words by simply hovering over the icon which shows that the word was blocked. There's really no reason not to do it. IMPORTANT EDIT: The words WILL be changed by the admin who imports it. They will not be the same, and you will not get banned for saying darn! Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs) 20:43, January 16, 2012 (UTC) (forgot my sig :P) Support
SuperSpyX Tell me your secrets You cannot hide 20:53, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
P.S.- Aren't we supposed to all be teens anyways? We should be able to handle these words. -_- --Lord Shu 23:01, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 04:38, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 21:35, January 17, 2012 (UTC) Comments
Arbitrary section breakWall of text - This is my main concern. Isn't censoring the mainspace a much higher priority? A significant portion of our non-editor readers are 13-, but there are no underage users in chat (I hope). Here are some more cons:
Kids under 13 are not allowed in chat. Why try to make it safe for them if we have all these disadvantages? Why aren't we making the mainspace safer instead? FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:33, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Who will import it?Before this forum is closed, who will import the filter if it is decided to use it? Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
What counts as a censor?^^^ --Czech 08:44, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
closed (by request) with decision to implement on some level Although I've voted, I really am not worried about this as I never use chat, so feel I can look at this objectively. Obvously the word list is still to be decided, but I really can't see what the harm is in censoring some of the "higher-level" words. As far as the "freedom of speech" argument goes, it's no different to beeping out swearing on the news on tv, and if you want to see what the word is, you have that option. I would recommend that admins involved with the chat feature to work on a list "off-wiki". I don't think we really want our wiki to be at the top of a list of search results when they're typed into google (although i'm not sure that they'll have to go in a js file anyway) NightblazeSaber 03:02, February 8, 2012 (UTC) |