This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Droideka article.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
|
Another one[]
They made another droideka. I must say they could have done a better job. The last version was all right, but this one is cute. Starfan79 (talk) 06:16, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Ugh. Every time they redo the droideka it ends up looking worse. The first version, while not great, was the best. They ought to make some new moulds to get a droideka the right shape and size. Brick-built destroyers will never look good if they're supposed to be minifigure-scale.
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:21, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- You're right. Also, the newest droideka looks more like a Sith War Droid (Mark I) than a droideka, even though the Sith war droids have four legs. That's what I think, anyway. It is the midsection that should be bulky, not the head. The head of real droidekas is flat. Starfan79 (talk) 18:28, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- By the way here's what they look like: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sith_war_droid_Mark_I Starfan79 (talk) 18:29, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- You're right. Also, the newest droideka looks more like a Sith War Droid (Mark I) than a droideka, even though the Sith war droids have four legs. That's what I think, anyway. It is the midsection that should be bulky, not the head. The head of real droidekas is flat. Starfan79 (talk) 18:28, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:00, January 10, 2013 (UTC)