FANDOM


  • This thread is for rumours and recent news only. For Super Heroes wishlists and speculation, please see here.

    DC Universe

    Recently released

    Upcoming
    Games

    Comic-Con promotions

    Set gallery

    Marvel

    Recently released

    Upcoming releases

    Comic-Con promotions
    October release
    Set gallery
      Loading editor
    • Oh my that broke a bit. :3

        Loading editor
    • Ajraddatz wrote: Oh my that broke a bit. :3

      I'll clean it up to be nice and pretty like that Ninjago one. :P

        Loading editor
    • 76001

      I don't like it. The Tumbler doesn't seem correctly proportioned & The Bat looks odd.

      (edit by NBS- image shrunk down)

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, for a set representing a dark movie, it looks more cartoonish than almost anything else we've seen. :/

        Loading editor
    • 50.99.247.48 wrote: Yeah, for a set representing a dark movie, it looks more cartoonish than almost anything else we've seen. :/

      Yeah.. That's a bit odd, really.

        Loading editor
    • I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

        Loading editor
    • I don't mind the Bat (although I'm not too keen on the blue), but I really don't like the Tumbler at all!

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      Same here Berry.

        Loading editor
    • Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

      Same with Berry the jet looks too plain so it's just a random jet/hamster car hybrid with a main MARVEL villain in it....

        Loading editor
    • Are y'all interested in a Green Lantern set(s)?

        Loading editor
    • Yes!!!

        Loading editor
    • ShyTy wrote: Are y'all interested in a Green Lantern set(s)?

      We aren't expecting any GL sets... o.o

        Loading editor
    • CzechMate wrote:

      ShyTy wrote: Are y'all interested in a Green Lantern set(s)?

      We aren't expecting any GL sets... o.o

      this O.o shyty please do tell us about these "Green Lantern" sets

        Loading editor
    • I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      I WANT GL SETS! Lol . No really i do even though i have a custom.
      
        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

      Same with Berry the jet looks too plain so it's just a random jet/hamster car hybrid with a main MARVEL villain in it....

      I think it is pretty good. They could have done better on Nova or at least just improved his helmet and darkened the colours.

        Loading editor
    • Som1udontno wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

      Same with Berry the jet looks too plain so it's just a random jet/hamster car hybrid with a main MARVEL villain in it....

      I think it is pretty good. They could have done better on Nova or at least just improved his helmet and darkened the colours.

      Acutually brighten the blue and make the yellow more of a dark goldish and the colours would look good.

        Loading editor
    • Som1udontno wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

      Same with Berry the jet looks too plain so it's just a random jet/hamster car hybrid with a main MARVEL villain in it....

      I think it is pretty good. They could have done better on Nova or at least just improved his helmet and darkened the colours.

      Yeah, I meant Nova. Doctor Doom too, he is too cartoony for even me. And then Spider-Man's blue is unbalanced, he was the half. :P They are okay (Spidey and Doom), I would just rather have comic versions.

        Loading editor
    • i read somewhere that a kid thought beetle was a butterfly so he asked his mom for the set with the red butterfly

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Som1udontno wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      I honestly like Dr. doom and his jet ..... thats about it though... NightblazeSaber wrote: Am I the only one who's a bit underwhelmed by the Bugle? It doesn't look bad I guess, I just thought it'd be a bit bigger in terms of depth- it only looks about 6 studs deep. For this reason, I'm a bit worried about Iron Man's mansion now, I hope it turns out to be as awesome as the name implies. I like the look of Doom's jet though.

      No. I actually really hate the Doomjet and most of the minifigures though (eh, two and a half). It's mostly because it's even too cartoony for me. That fire escape bothers me so much....

      Same with Berry the jet looks too plain so it's just a random jet/hamster car hybrid with a main MARVEL villain in it....

      I think it is pretty good. They could have done better on Nova or at least just improved his helmet and darkened the colours.

      Yeah, I meant Nova. Doctor Doom too, he is too cartoony for even me. And then Spider-Man's blue is unbalanced, he was the half. :P They are okay (Spidey and Doom), I would just rather have comic versions.

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote: i read somewhere that a kid thought beetle was a butterfly so he asked his mom for the set with the red butterfly

      That kid was you :P.

        Loading editor
    • no.....

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote: no.....

      Yes it was!

        Loading editor
    • no i didn't :P

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

        Loading editor
    • Admiral Neo wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

      Green Lantern....

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Admiral Neo wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

      Green Lantern....

      Hahahah

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Admiral Neo wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

      Green Lantern....

      Hahahah

      XD

        Loading editor
    • Cligra
      Cligra removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      23:31, October 13, 2012
      This reply has been removed
    • Cligra
      Cligra removed this reply because:
      Off-topic.
      23:31, October 13, 2012
      This reply has been removed
    • Bear in mind we'll be getting a new (probably better) version of Nova when the Guardians film comes out in 2014.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah.

        Loading editor
    • King of Nynrah wrote: Bear in mind we'll be getting a new (probably better) version of Nova when the Guardians film comes out in 2014.

      Sounds good then :) I thought Guardians of the Galaxy involved a team consisting of a some guy, some psychic guy, some girl, a racoon and a tree. I never knew any Earthlings were directly involved with them

        Loading editor
    • King of Nynrah wrote: Bear in mind we'll be getting a new (probably better) version of Nova when the Guardians film comes out in 2014.

      Oh heck no, I am sick of seeing "oh nova is going to be in GOTG" NO! Nova is not going to be in GOTG it has already been confirmed what team members are going to be in the movie, here is the list: Drax the Destroyer, Groot, Star-Lord, Rocket Raccoon, and Gamora, look them up if you don't know who they are. Sorry i just could not help but nerd out.

        Loading editor
    • From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know. It should be more....chunky? The bat looks cool and can easily be remolded into a Space MOC.

      Do I spy flick-fire missiles?

      Omega X

        Loading editor
    • Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

      Yea really ...

        Loading editor
    • THETHOMAS4 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

      Yea really ...

      Yes and no neither one of the tumblers are size accurate and if you're a MOC person a 100 pieces or so is all you need to make it better and more size accurate.

        Loading editor
    • THETHOMAS4 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

      Yea really ...

      It isn't as wide, and it's a bit tall, but it's about as accurate size-wise as I could expect nearly anything LEGO to be.

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Admiral Neo wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

      Green Lantern....

      Hahahah

      Oh, alright. That makes a lot more sense :P.

        Loading editor
    • Admiral Neo wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Admiral Neo wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I think he was just asking if anybody else wanted GL sets.

      GL? What does that stand for? Good looking?

      Green Lantern....

      Hahahah

      Oh, alright. That makes a lot more sense :P.

      Yeah, it does :P.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      THETHOMAS4 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

      Yea really ...

      It isn't as wide, and it's a bit tall, but it's about as accurate size-wise as I could expect nearly anything LEGO to be.

      Hm.....I was comparing it with the old Tumbler. As I said, I've never watched TDKR. But after seeing the picture it is accurate actually...

      Omega X

        Loading editor
    • The Daily Bugle looks fine. I don't think Dr. Doom looks cartoony at all... The Doomjet looks quite well designed, and I don't even understand why people are complaining about the fire escape... I hoped that the building would be just a tiny bit bigger, but I suppose this will do!

      The cockpit of the Bat looks a bit too clunky, it's barely movie accurate (not counting the flick-fire missiles), and the blue wrecks it, even if it weren't based on a movie. The Tumbler would be good for mini scale, but for minifigure scale it's too small; I believe someone of Brickset even compared the dimensions...

      I have good hopes for the other sets, but bad expectations... after the Batman set...

        Loading editor
    • Omega X.23 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      THETHOMAS4 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Omega X.23 wrote:

      From a person who've not seen TDKR, the set looks quitee interesting, although the Tumbler is really undersized from what I know.

      Omega X

      Not really

      Yea really ...

      It isn't as wide, and it's a bit tall, but it's about as accurate size-wise as I could expect nearly anything LEGO to be.

      Hm.....I was comparing it with the old Tumbler. As I said, I've never watched TDKR. But after seeing the picture it is accurate actually...

      Omega X

      Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

        Loading editor
    • Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote: Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

      that awkward moment when you need to facepalm 1000 times.. may I introduce a new concept to you....

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote: Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote: Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

      that awkward moment when you need to facepalm 1000 times.. may I introduce a new concept to you....

      That isn't awkward. Sore perhaps.

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote: Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote: Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

      that awkward moment when you need to facepalm 1000 times.. may I introduce a new concept to you....

      Sorry, I hadn't seen the movie, and it was like, 7:00 PM, and for some reason, I was tired :P.

        Loading editor
    • Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote: Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote: Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

      that awkward moment when you need to facepalm 1000 times.. may I introduce a new concept to you....

      Sorry, I hadn't seen the movie, and it was like, 7:00 PM, and for some reason, I was tired :P.

      sorry :p

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote:

      Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote: Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 wrote: Sorry, I may be behind, but what is TDKR?

      that awkward moment when you need to facepalm 1000 times.. may I introduce a new concept to you....

      Sorry, I hadn't seen the movie, and it was like, 7:00 PM, and for some reason, I was tired :P.

      sorry :p

      It's alright :P. I was never really mad. Although.... Nah :P.

        Loading editor
    • IM3 Trailer (uploaded by LSHF)

      Warning: the following comments do address content in the trailer, so... spoilers?

      To me, this suggests 76007 will contain the gold Iron Man and Pepper Potts, and will unfortunately contain a helicopter with the mansion (unfortunate because it means less pieces for the mansion, I really hope they don't do a Bugle on this set)

      Sad to see all those pretty suits destroyed ;( Hopefully we'll see some of them still in the set.

      • Worst case scenario- 3 minifigs (Iron Man in suit, Pepper Potts, whoever was in the helicopter), bad mansion with bad helicopter. I really can't see them getting away with not having Pepper in the set, she looks pretty essential to this scene.
      • Best case scenario- Tony Stark, Pepper, lots of suits, well designed mansion (+the helicopter stuff again)

      Also, the new War Machine looks amazing, can't wait to get him in LEGO (like they're not going to release a minifig of something that awesome)

        Loading editor
    • All I care about from Iron Man 3 is the face of Iron Patriot, they'll probably use the same actor for Norman Osborne in future movies of the Amazing Spider-Man series.

        Loading editor
    • God IM3 looks depressing.....

        Loading editor
    • NuffSaid1995 wrote: God IM3 looks depressing.....

      Haha yeah, I was expecting it to have a much more happy Avengers-ish feel to it (unless the trailer's trying to be misleading, but I don't think it is).

        Loading editor
    • IM3 looks interesting. I read from the director that "Tony will be stripped down and forced to use his intellect to survive, just as he was in the cave in the first film". I'm also glad that Mandarin is able to do this, it does his character justice from the comics.

      And of course, I can't wait to get them all in minifigure form. :P

        Loading editor
    • IMO it looks great, and War Machines/Iron Patriots armor <3 can't wait to see all of the minifigures.

        Loading editor
    • Awesomeknight1234 wrote: All I care about from Iron Man 3 is the face of Iron Patriot, they'll probably use the same actor for Norman Osborne in future movies of the Amazing Spider-Man series.

      No...Iron Patriot is supposedly War Machine. Marvel Studios doesn't have the rights to Norman Osborne/Green Goblin.

        Loading editor
    • Per Berrybrick... even if Marvel made the Amazing Spider-Man films, Iron Patriot would still have nothing to do with Osborn, as he's already been established in the Cinematic Universe as James Rhodes.

        Loading editor
    • That's what I thought too, but (in my opinion) he looked like a villain by the way he set him up in the trailer. And there's also this. Also, if they ever confirmed War Machine and Iron Patriot are the same person, please link me too it.

        Loading editor
    • Legosuperheroesfan wrote: And there's also this.

      I don't see the relevance of that since it didn't happen. I don't follow the MCU, so I'd need KoN or someone else to link to where it was confirmed exactly.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Legosuperheroesfan wrote: And there's also this.

      I don't see the relevance of that since it didn't happen. I don't follow the MCU, so I'd need KoN or someone else to link to where it was confirmed exactly.

      Marvel and Sony both say they want to do crossovers on a much smaller scale , but who knows , Marvel might just let Sony use the Iron Patriot armour for Norman Osborn .

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      ^Wait... when I said I didn't like the new Tumbler on one of the News Blogs you said it looked good. So why do you agree with CJC when he says he dislikes it?

        Loading editor
    • Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      ^Wait... when I said I didn't like the new Tumbler on one of the News Blogs you said it looked good. So why do you agree with CJC when he says he dislikes it?

      Inconsistent word choice. Sometimes it looks good to me, other times it is meh.

      And plus, the things I am suggesting they do are very different and much simpler than what other people are.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      ^Wait... when I said I didn't like the new Tumbler on one of the News Blogs you said it looked good. So why do you agree with CJC when he says he dislikes it?

      Inconsistent word choice. Sometimes it looks good to me, other times it is meh.

      And plus, the things I am suggesting they do are very different and much simpler than what other people are.

      I suppose, but then your still agreeing with me on the more broader view of the subject. That the set could be improved.

        Loading editor
    • Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      ^Wait... when I said I didn't like the new Tumbler on one of the News Blogs you said it looked good. So why do you agree with CJC when he says he dislikes it?

      Inconsistent word choice. Sometimes it looks good to me, other times it is meh.

      And plus, the things I am suggesting they do are very different and much simpler than what other people are.

      I suppose, but then your still agreeing with me on the more broader view of the subject. That the set could be improved.

      Essentially, but I don't share your opinion that it has to be scrapped and that it is total garbage. (Not that that is necessarily yours, but it seems to be the majority's consensus.)

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Power Jim wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: I like it cartoony. I think that they could have done a bit better job on the Tumbler, it could use at least a sticker on the windshield, but I actually prefer this version of the BAT. I didn't really like it in the movie, but now it isn't believable at all, which is good. :P

      ^Wait... when I said I didn't like the new Tumbler on one of the News Blogs you said it looked good. So why do you agree with CJC when he says he dislikes it?

      Inconsistent word choice. Sometimes it looks good to me, other times it is meh.

      And plus, the things I am suggesting they do are very different and much simpler than what other people are.

      I suppose, but then your still agreeing with me on the more broader view of the subject. That the set could be improved.

      Essentially, but I don't share your opinion that it has to be scrapped and that it is total garbage. (Not that that is necessarily yours, but it seems to be the majority's consensus.)

      For the record, I'm not someone who agrees that it should be completely scrapped and I do understand your opinion.

        Loading editor
    • When I saw it at comic con, it was a lot bigger than it looks.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      NuffSaid1995 wrote: God IM3 looks depressing.....

      Haha yeah, I was expecting it to have a much more happy Avengers-ish feel to it (unless the trailer's trying to be misleading, but I don't think it is).

      Wow. It looks (just judging by the trailer :P) head and shoulders above IM2.... This one might actually be worth watching!

        Loading editor
    • There is still going to be a marvel set. This year there were 6 dc sets (6857,6858,6860,6862,6863+6864) and 6 marvel sets (6865.6866,6867,6868,6869+6873). Next year there are 6 starting sets (10937,76000,76001,76004+76005) and 6 summer sets (76002,76003,76006,76007,76008+76009) so there is still 1 more set and possibly 6 more ultrabuild

        Loading editor
    • 86.140.87.87 wrote: There is still going to be a marvel set. This year there were 6 dc sets (6857,6858,6860,6862,6863+6864) and 6 marvel sets (6865.6866,6867,6868,6869+6873). Next year there are 6 starting sets (10937,76000,76001,76004+76005) and 6 summer sets (76002,76003,76006,76007,76008+76009) so there is still 1 more set and possibly 6 more ultrabuild

      Since Arkham is a D2C set, I wouldn't count it.

        Loading editor
    • LEGO counts it, so It's part of the wave.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote: LEGO counts it, so It's part of the wave.

      I didn't say it isn't part of the wave. I meant it shouldn't be counted in comparing the number of DC sets to the number of Marvel because it is a special set.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: LEGO counts it, so It's part of the wave.

      I didn't say it isn't part of the wave. I meant it shouldn't be counted in comparing the number of DC sets to the number of Marvel because it is a special set.

      Then that means LEGO is lying other wise it counts.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: LEGO counts it, so It's part of the wave.

      I didn't say it isn't part of the wave. I meant it shouldn't be counted in comparing the number of DC sets to the number of Marvel because it is a special set.

      Then that means LEGO is lying other wise it counts.

      What? No it doesn't...

      LEGO never said DC would have the exact same amount of sets as Marvel (or vice versa). They never said it wasn't being released in January, and neither did I. What I said is that it...I'm not repeating myself for you.

        Loading editor
    • They "said" there was going to be a equal amount of sets from both marvel and DC, not counting Arkham is going against that.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote: They "said" there was going to be a equal amount of sets from both marvel and DC, not counting Arkham is going against that.

      Source?

        Loading editor
    • I forgot but it was a lego site(eurobricks etc), of course I could be wrong and the source might just be a random person saying that they "said" that, but like I said Arkham counts as a set it's just an exclusive.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote: I forgot but it was a lego site(eurobricks etc), of course I could be wrong and the source might just be a random person saying that they "said" that, but like I said Arkham counts as a set it's just an exclusive.

      • Eurobricks is a LEGO fan site. Nothing there is totally official. I haven't been there in about half a month, but I remember people saying that there had to be another Marvel set because of Arkham, but they didn't back it up. Not a source
      • Pretty much what you said. It's not logicless, but it isn't something anybody heard from anything official.
      • I didn't say it didn't count as a set! Stop putting words in my mouth.
        Loading editor
    • .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

        Loading editor
    • I have a little more than half a mind. Subject warned. Any further comments of this sort will result in a block. I sincerely hope this conversation is over.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

      Hey, neither is Arkham. It is a D2C set.

      Who was sarcastic? Because it wasn't me, and you didn't say anything I thought was sarcastic. That is called a mistake. Some of us make them and admit to it. >_>

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

      Hey, neither is Arkham. It is a D2C set.

      Who was sarcastic? Because it wasn't me, and you didn't say anything I thought was sarcastic. That is called a mistake. Some of us make them and admit to it. >_>

      ...*eyeroll*....again you said this year when you where talking about next years sets.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

      Hey, neither is Arkham. It is a D2C set.

      Who was sarcastic? Because it wasn't me, and you didn't say anything I thought was sarcastic. That is called a mistake. Some of us make them and admit to it. >_>

      ...*eyeroll*

      Good, that means we are done if all you can do is roll your eyes.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

      Hey, neither is Arkham. It is a D2C set.

      Who was sarcastic? Because it wasn't me, and you didn't say anything I thought was sarcastic. That is called a mistake. Some of us make them and admit to it. >_>

      Just quit the arrgument. I get into arguments at home all the time and if this continues this will get ugly

        Loading editor
    • May I ask what the point of this argument is? One of you's going to be proven wrong eventually and not until quite some time, as there is no source for any of this. It's not like this is an urgent, important matter, and it also doesn't seem like either of you are going to admit to having made any sort of mistake during this debate (like sarcasm or hypocrisy), so what the heck?

        Loading editor
    • Legoindy7734 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: .........What I meant was that you don't count it as making an even amount of sets between marvel and DC. I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure.

      I count it as a set. I count it as a DC set and a Super Heroes set and not a Marvel set. I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year because Arkham is the D2C set for all normal themes. The only others that get sets like this are Star Wars and sometimes City, who get special treatment. It is special. Marvel will probably get one eventually, but not this year. But the number of sets won't be evenly balanced, and if it is, it will be by something stupid like Marvel having one more polybag or DC having some exclusive figure, which doesn't really count. If they were matched, it would be bad for business due to competition between two large sets of similar subjects.


      You have no proof. >_> For somebody who hates rumors/potentially false info so much that they will question valid sources, you sure believe a lot of it.

      I think Marvel is getting an even amount of sets as is DC, is what I meant by "I do know that it is not a true source, but it is lego's will I am sure".

      Also you might want to go to a doctor.

      Prove it. Though I agree that they might want the same amount of regular sets, Arkham is not a regular one. If you actually did your research, you would probably have noticed that Marvel had one more polybag than DC last year.

      I am very frustrated with you. You have displayed hypocrisy, which is a very annoying thing to deal with, are very rude, as evidenced by saying things like, "Also, you might want to go to a doctor," and you put words in my mouth, which is an even more annoying thing to do. I have half a mind to give you a warning for that doctor comment. T_T

      Polybags don't count as mainstream sets. And cool down what I meant is that you said "I do not think that Marvel is getting an even amount of sets to DC this year", It's not 2013 and you said "this year" it was more or less sarcasm.

      Hey, neither is Arkham. It is a D2C set.

      Who was sarcastic? Because it wasn't me, and you didn't say anything I thought was sarcastic. That is called a mistake. Some of us make them and admit to it. >_>

      Just quit the arrgument. I get into arguments at home all the time and if this continues this will get ugly

      And yes I will stop.

        Loading editor
    • 50.99.240.54 wrote: May I ask what the point of this argument is? One of you's going to be proven wrong eventually and not until quite some time, as there is no source for any of this. It's not like this is an urgent, important matter, and it also doesn't seem like either of you are going to admit to having made any sort of mistake during this debate (like sarcasm or hypocrisy), so what the heck?

      I guess it wasn't that clear, but what I meant by that mistake comment was that I made one and that I wasn't being sarcastic.

      I know it is a dumb argument, and I wish that I had pointed it out or that somebody else had sooner, before I got wrapped up in it. But what does it is his hypocrisy, first of all, and we both draw things out longer than we should, so it's not a good combination, but what really does it is his antagonism. I admitted to a mistake, even if it wasn't clear, and he continued pointing it out and it's behavior like that, mine too, I do argue a lot and don't do such a good job at ending them, that makes these arguments.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      50.99.240.54 wrote: May I ask what the point of this argument is? One of you's going to be proven wrong eventually and not until quite some time, as there is no source for any of this. It's not like this is an urgent, important matter, and it also doesn't seem like either of you are going to admit to having made any sort of mistake during this debate (like sarcasm or hypocrisy), so what the heck?

      I guess it wasn't that clear, but what I meant by that mistake comment was that I made one and that I wasn't being sarcastic.

      I know it is a dumb argument, and I wish that I had pointed it out or that somebody else had sooner, before I got wrapped up in it. But what does it is his hypocrisy, first of all, and we both draw things out longer than we should, so it's not a good combination, but what really does it is his antagonism. I admitted to a mistake, even if it wasn't clear, and he continued pointing it out and it's behavior like that, mine too, I do argue a lot and don't do such a good job at ending them, that makes these arguments.

      I know what happened, I just didn't want it to continue happening :P Anyway, it's good that it stopped. No point in continuing.

        Loading editor
    • New Man of Steel trailer.

      Man of Steel - Official Trailer 2 HD-002:33

      Man of Steel - Official Trailer 2 HD-0

        Loading editor
    • i cant wfor fr4eeze scarecrow and penguin

        Loading editor
    • Release date of May confirmed for Iron Man 3 sets: [1]

      Pretty obvious that it'd coincide with the film's release, but good to know nonetheless

        Loading editor
    • I'm not overly happy with the DC sets for 2013 - they don't interest me. Arkham looks great, but $259.99 for 1600 pieces? Versus 10228 which has 2064 pieces and $269.99. I know it is licensed, but...c'mon, those prices are too high.

      I am gonna tip that GL comes in next year, with a set with Scarecrow.

        Loading editor
    • Where I live, sets to be based off a new movie always arrive a month early. So I'll probably be getting the IM3 sets in April.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber
      NightblazeSaber removed this reply because:
      moved to new thread
      22:55, January 5, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • NightblazeSaber
      NightblazeSaber removed this reply because:
      -
      22:56, January 5, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • CzechMate wrote: I'm not overly happy with the DC sets for 2013 - they don't interest me. Arkham looks great, but $259.99 for 1600 pieces? Versus 10228 which has 2064 pieces and $269.99. I know it is licensed, but...c'mon, those prices are too high.

      I am gonna tip that GL comes in next year, with a set with Scarecrow.

      Well you could order the set off of a American website.

        Loading editor
    • A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

        Loading editor
    • Hmmm, very interesting figure, Berrybrick...

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      Does anyone else think his second face looks kinda odd?

        Loading editor
    • Soupperson1 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      Does anyone else think his second face looks kinda odd?

      nope, but i think he comes with a Shoulder Cannon

        Loading editor
    • Just randomly thought of this- what do you think the chances are that we're going to get a wave of sets based upon the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV series when it airs? Since it's going to be a part of the Marvel cinematic universe, I think we might see a few sets, might be a good way to get a lot of SHIELD agents

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: Just randomly thought of this- what do you think the chances are that we're going to get a wave of sets based upon the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV series when it airs? Since it's going to be a part of the Marvel cinematic universe, I think we might see a few sets, might be a good way to get a lot of SHIELD agents

      what show?

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: Just randomly thought of this- what do you think the chances are that we're going to get a wave of sets based upon the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV series when it airs? Since it's going to be a part of the Marvel cinematic universe, I think we might see a few sets, might be a good way to get a lot of SHIELD agents

      I'd hope not, based on the Ultimate Spider-Man TV show - an absolutely terrible show - and the sets aren't that great, either.

      I don't think LEGO can push for many more products - yet.

        Loading editor
    • CzechMate wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Just randomly thought of this- what do you think the chances are that we're going to get a wave of sets based upon the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV series when it airs? Since it's going to be a part of the Marvel cinematic universe, I think we might see a few sets, might be a good way to get a lot of SHIELD agents

      I'd hope not, based on the Ultimate Spider-Man TV show - an absolutely terrible show - and the sets aren't that great, either.

      I don't think LEGO can push for many more products - yet.

      I don't think it'll be anything like that- it's a live-action show starring Coulson (and played by the guy who plays Coulson in all the films).

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      CzechMate wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Just randomly thought of this- what do you think the chances are that we're going to get a wave of sets based upon the new S.H.I.E.L.D. TV series when it airs? Since it's going to be a part of the Marvel cinematic universe, I think we might see a few sets, might be a good way to get a lot of SHIELD agents

      I'd hope not, based on the Ultimate Spider-Man TV show - an absolutely terrible show - and the sets aren't that great, either.

      I don't think LEGO can push for many more products - yet.

      I don't think it'll be anything like that- it's a live-action show starring Coulson (and played by the guy who plays Coulson in all the films).

      Ah, didn't know that.

      I still doubt any sets being released within the next 5 months - possibly a special set in a Marvel one-off set if anything?

        Loading editor
    • @Racelord- forum glitch- I can't actually see your comment here, but I saw it in the RC. Coulson's the only character in the main cast that isn't new, might get some cameos though if we're lucky :) Everything I know is just from Wikipedia's page (link). It's written and directed by Joss Whedon (who wrote and directed The Avengers) so it should be good :)

      @Czech- it'll definitely be a while before we get sets if sets were to happen- the series hasn't even been filmed yet, will probably be 2014

        Loading editor
    • At most I say we'll get two shows of the sheild tv show

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Sets I want to get: Arctic Batman vs. Mr. Freeze Aquaman on ice, Spider-man hunting with spider-cycle, The bat vs. Bane tumbler chase. Mabey Arkham Asylum

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: That War Machine looks great! Really want the Iron man 3 and man of steel sets!

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I hope lego makes Thor 2 and Captian America 2 sets!

        Loading editor
    • Piececounts for 76006-08 are up.

      364 pieces for Iron Man's mansion- worst news ever ;(

      Take out 100-150 pieces for the helicopter attacking the mansion, and you're only left with 260-200 pieces for the mansion :/

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Piececounts for 76006-08 are up.

      364 pieces for Iron Man's mansion- worst news ever ;(

      Take out 100-150 pieces for the helicopter attacking the mansion, and you're only left with 260-200 pieces for the mansion :/

      The worst is the Mandarin set, which i take to be the final battle, is the smallest set.

      Depends on the battle in the movie. Eg, the Star Wars Episode II set between Yoda and Dooku made sense to be small- it was a big empty room, and all about the two characters. If Iron Man and the Mandarin fight in a deserted place in the film, it makes sense for it to be a small set.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      Djgourhan wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Piececounts for 76006-08 are up.

      364 pieces for Iron Man's mansion- worst news ever ;(

      Take out 100-150 pieces for the helicopter attacking the mansion, and you're only left with 260-200 pieces for the mansion :/

      The worst is the Mandarin set, which i take to be the final battle, is the smallest set.

      Depends on the battle in the movie. Eg, the Star Wars Episode II set between Yoda and Dooku made sense to be small- it was a big empty room, and all about the two characters. If Iron Man and the Mandarin fight in a deserted place in the film, it makes sense for it to be a small set.

      well the ep. 2 did have Obi-wan and Anakin, but they where down on the ground, the Iron Man 3 movie could have War Machine and Pepper on the ground too if the set is small (i mean only have Iron Man and the Mandarin in the set)

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote: I know, but the title makes it sound like the battle of all battles, the end fight. Extremis sounds like the beginning of the movie, Mansion sound like the middle, and the Ultimate sounds like the finale.

      Don Cheadle said the end fight is big and huge and awesome,he said the area the filmed it was big. Him saying that means at least War Machine is at the end fight, if Rescue rumors are true, Rescue will need some butt kicking screen time.

      But we will start finding out on Tuesday.

      i hope they make a Rescue figure (Pepper i think)

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Djgourhan wrote: I know, but the title makes it sound like the battle of all battles, the end fight. Extremis sounds like the beginning of the movie, Mansion sound like the middle, and the Ultimate sounds like the finale.

      Don Cheadle said the end fight is big and huge and awesome,he said the area the filmed it was big. Him saying that means at least War Machine is at the end fight, if Rescue rumors are true, Rescue will need some butt kicking screen time.

      But we will start finding out on Tuesday.

      i hope they make a Rescue figure (Pepper i think)

      Pepper seems important to Iron Man 3, more than usual. Rumors are other toy companies were shown a female iron Man suit.

      They would also need to make the Iron Patriot vesion of War Machine too. Brickset doesn't provide sources for their discoveries, so i don't know if we can trust the piece count. plus lower piece counts normally have the saller set numbers.

      ya, other then new Iron Man, War Machine, and Mandarin figure they should make: Pepper, Rescue, and Iron Patriot (only guys in the movie i know)

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      How can you be sure if it's just a custom figure? Lots of con-artists try to rip us off by passing custom minifigures off as real.

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      How can you be sure if it's just a custom figure? Lots of con-artists try to rip us off by passing custom minifigures off as real.

      Because other future figures have leaked from his store before.

      Besides, I can usually tell the difference between custom and official figures. I wouldn't have shared it if I suspected it was a fake.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      How can you be sure if it's just a custom figure? Lots of con-artists try to rip us off by passing custom minifigures off as real.

      Because other future figures have leaked from his store before.

      Besides, I can usually tell the difference between custom and official figures. I wouldn't have shared it if I suspected it was a fake.

      How would he have gotten it in the first place?

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: A War Machine figure popped up on eBay.

      I myself think the figure looks pretty good. I might actually buy an IM3 set now. :P

      How can you be sure if it's just a custom figure? Lots of con-artists try to rip us off by passing custom minifigures off as real.

      Because other future figures have leaked from his store before.

      Besides, I can usually tell the difference between custom and official figures. I wouldn't have shared it if I suspected it was a fake.

      How would he have gotten it in the first place?

      Factory leaks. They have happened before.

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Looks like all these im3 sets are cheap! I really want a Iron Patriot and a Mark 42 suit and Pepper.

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I hope the mansion has a place to put all the suits. You could have four clear windows for the Iron man suits. One for mark 1, another one for mark 2, another one for mark 42, and another one for War Machine.

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      50.32.15.213 wrote: The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I hope the mansion has a place to put all the suits. You could have four clear windows for the Iron man suits. One for mark 1, another one for mark 2, another one for mark 42, and another one for War Machine.

      Well for $40, we might not get a proper Hall of Armor. It might no have one or a small stirckered one.

      Mark I would be all Special Parts, at least the helmet, maybe fit a figure inside

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Djgourhan wrote:

      50.32.15.213 wrote: The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I hope the mansion has a place to put all the suits. You could have four clear windows for the Iron man suits. One for mark 1, another one for mark 2, another one for mark 42, and another one for War Machine.

      Well for $40, we might not get a proper Hall of Armor. It might no have one or a small stirckered one.

      Mark I would be all Special Parts, at least the helmet, maybe fit a figure inside

      Just a new helmet, and the Galaxy Patrol armor with a Arc Reactor printed tile on the stud.

      ya, but it is big armour, not as big as the Big one (Hulk Buster i think)

        Loading editor
    • Well for $40, we might not get a proper Hall of Armor. It might no have one or a small stirckered one.

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: A stickerd on would be lame.

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I would just like a hall of armor. I wonder what the rest of the set will have in it.

        Loading editor

    • ya, but it is big armour, not as big as the Big one (Hulk Buster i think)

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Hulk Buster is the name, and it's GIANT.
      
        Loading editor
    • Glad to see this thread seething with optimism.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: Glad to see this thread seething with optimism.

      :P

      Well, there's not a whole lot to be optimistic about is there? (at least for 76007). The Daily Bugle looks a bit small to me, and that was 476 pieces. Maybe the mansion's going to be one big sticker and we'll only get the helicopter ;) But it will be seriously disappointing if they do just have stickers for the Hall of Armour- this is their one big chance to release any of the Mark I-V suits, to not release any will be a missed opportunity.

      The other sets though I'm looking forward to seeing, no complaints from me about them based on the piececounts :)

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: Glad to see this thread seething with optimism.

      :P

      Well, there's not a whole lot to be optimistic about is there? (at least for 76007). The Daily Bugle looks a bit small to me, and that was 476 pieces. Maybe the mansion's going to be one big sticker and we'll only get the helicopter ;) But it will be seriously disappointing if they do just have stickers for the Hall of Armour- this is their one big chance to release any of the Mark I-V suits, to not release any will be a missed opportunity.

      The piececounts is pretty much what I meant.

      "Chance" seems like a poor word choice, since they have no reason to want to include another suit. If it is a sticker, then oh well. Easy enough mod. If not, it would only be a canister holding whatever suit is in the set (assuming it includes Tony too), and if there are any others, they would be empty. Expectations for that set were too high in the first place.

        Loading editor
    • Minifigs come in which sets: http://brickfanatics.co.uk/toy-fair-report/

        Loading editor
    • LEGO2013Helper wrote: Minifigs come in which sets: http://brickfanatics.co.uk/toy-fair-report/

      Amazing... I love it :')

        Loading editor
    • Apparently we are getting a Batgirl microfigure too. :P I am embarrassed at how excited I am about that. :P

      I just hope it foreshadows a minifigure of her in 2014. <3

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: Apparently we are getting a Batgirl microfigure too. :P I am embarrassed at how excited I am about that. :P

      I just hope it foreshadows a minifigure of her in 2014. <3

      they probally will, if the batgirl microfig is coming out :D

        Loading editor
    • Soupperson1 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: Apparently we are getting a Batgirl microfigure too. :P I am embarrassed at how excited I am about that. :P

      I just hope it foreshadows a minifigure of her in 2014. <3

      they probally will, if the batgirl microfig is coming out :D

      Well, I was thinking about that Harry Potter game with the generic Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw characters when we never got minifigures with either house's robes. I guess that they weren't really characters though (even though I think the latter was based on Cho, but I digress).

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Soupperson1 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: Apparently we are getting a Batgirl microfigure too. :P I am embarrassed at how excited I am about that. :P

      I just hope it foreshadows a minifigure of her in 2014. <3

      they probally will, if the batgirl microfig is coming out :D

      Well, I was thinking about that Harry Potter game with the generic Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw characters when we never got minifigures with either house's robes. I guess that they weren't really characters though (even though I think the latter was based on Cho, but I digress).

      They were generic characters.

        Loading editor
    • I wouldn't bee surprised if we see Batgirl, but I'm hoping for the Flash, Green Lantern, and (if I'm really lucky) Killer Croc.

        Loading editor
    • Legosuperheroesfan wrote: I wouldn't bee surprised if we see Batgirl, but I'm hoping for the Flash, Green Lantern, and (if I'm really lucky) Killer Croc.

      A justice league board game would be awesome.

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Legosuperheroesfan wrote: I wouldn't bee surprised if we see Batgirl, but I'm hoping for the Flash, Green Lantern, and (if I'm really lucky) Killer Croc.

      A justice league board game would be awesome.

      Remeber there's a different tread for: Super Heroes Wishlist

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick
      Berrybrick removed this reply because:
      Duplicate post
      12:34, January 25, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • I FOUND A PATTERN! In 2011 3 minifigs were released as exclusives in San Diego and New York Comic Con: [[1]] In 2012 Superman was released in the only set that wasn't a disappointing Batman remake other than the funhouse In 2013 Batman was released in grey parts in the bat and bane tumbler chase In 2014, expect at least one set of GREEN LANTERN

        Loading editor
    • 24.24.171.31 wrote: I FOUND A PATTERN! In 2011 3 minifigs were released as exclusives in San Diego and New York Comic Con: [[1]] In 2012 Superman was released in the only set that wasn't a disappointing Batman remake other than the funhouse In 2013 Batman was released in grey parts in the bat and bane tumbler chase In 2014, expect at least one set of GREEN LANTERN

      those are old figures...........

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote:

      24.24.171.31 wrote: I FOUND A PATTERN! In 2011 3 minifigs were released as exclusives in San Diego and New York Comic Con: [[1]] In 2012 Superman was released in the only set that wasn't a disappointing Batman remake other than the funhouse In 2013 Batman was released in grey parts in the bat and bane tumbler chase In 2014, expect at least one set of GREEN LANTERN

      those are old figures...........

      I think what he means is in 2012, we got Superman in a normal set. In 2013, we got a Batman that looks like the NYCC one. So expect a Green Lantern in 2014.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      24.24.171.31 wrote: I FOUND A PATTERN! In 2011 3 minifigs were released as exclusives in San Diego and New York Comic Con: [[1]] In 2012 Superman was released in the only set that wasn't a disappointing Batman remake other than the funhouse In 2013 Batman was released in grey parts in the bat and bane tumbler chase In 2014, expect at least one set of GREEN LANTERN

      those are old figures...........

      I think what he means is in 2012, we got Superman in a normal set. In 2013, we got a Batman that looks like the NYCC one. So expect a Green Lantern in 2014.

      Green lantern sets in 2014? If that does happen, I'd buy all of them!!

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      24.24.171.31 wrote: I FOUND A PATTERN! In 2011 3 minifigs were released as exclusives in San Diego and New York Comic Con: [[1]] In 2012 Superman was released in the only set that wasn't a disappointing Batman remake other than the funhouse In 2013 Batman was released in grey parts in the bat and bane tumbler chase In 2014, expect at least one set of GREEN LANTERN

      those are old figures...........

      I think what he means is in 2012, we got Superman in a normal set. In 2013, we got a Batman that looks like the NYCC one. So expect a Green Lantern in 2014.

      Green lantern sets in 2014? If that does happen, I'd buy all of them!!

      2014 better have Green Lantern, Thor, and Captain America sets

        Loading editor
    • WE SHOULD GET GREEN LANTERN! those were preview edition minifigures.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: possible heartbreaker suit

      It Does say "Deep Space Suit" on the box, unless the Heartbreaker Suit is a space suit, that isn't it

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: possible heartbreaker suit

      What does space have to do with heartbreak...ing? On a side note, considering that The Avengers 2 has to do with space I bet that (if the theme lasts that long) that suit will be made into a minifigure.

        Loading editor
    • If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      Well... :P

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      Mokey
      A monkey...
        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

      That probably would be considered animal abuse, that's why I said: Or a willing human. I've always wanted to explode, so they should send me up there!

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

      That probably would be considered animal abuse, that's why I said: Or a willing human. I've always wanted to explode, so they should send me up there!

      Eh...why would you want to explode? that is probably one of the most painful ways to die...

      Anyways this forum is for LEGO, not exploding monkeys.

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

      That probably would be considered animal abuse, that's why I said: Or a willing human. I've always wanted to explode, so they should send me up there!

      Eh...why would you want to explode? that is probably one of the most painful ways to die...

      Anyways this forum is for LEGO, not exploding monkeys.

      A forum for exploding monkeys. Awesome!!! Plus, I think exploding would be so quick, it wouldn't be painful. I'm starting a forum for exploding monkeys, so I think any further talk about this exploding space monkey thingy should be moved to that forum.

        Loading editor
    • Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

      That probably would be considered animal abuse, that's why I said: Or a willing human. I've always wanted to explode, so they should send me up there!

      Eh...why would you want to explode? that is probably one of the most painful ways to die...

      Anyways this forum is for LEGO, not exploding monkeys.

      A forum for exploding monkeys. Awesome!!! Plus, I think exploding would be so quick, it wouldn't be painful. I'm starting a forum for exploding monkeys, so I think any further talk about this exploding space monkey thingy should be moved to that forum.

      just toss Murderers into space, 1st Murderer in Space! lol

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      RaceLord wrote:

      Brikkyy13 wrote:

      Berrybrick wrote: If you go into space without a suit your capillaries would burst, but somehow I doubt that is it.... :P

      NASA or some other space organisation should do an experiment with a monkey!

      Monkey?

      I meant that if Scientists really wanted to prove that you would explode in space without a suit, they should toss a monkey (or a willing human!) out the door without any protective gear. I think you would just suffocate, not blow up.

      I am pretty sure it has been proven already....

      Besides, I personally consider that animal abuse, but we shouldn't go into that.

      That probably would be considered animal abuse, that's why I said: Or a willing human. I've always wanted to explode, so they should send me up there!

      Eh...why would you want to explode? that is probably one of the most painful ways to die...

      Anyways this forum is for LEGO, not exploding monkeys.

      A forum for exploding monkeys. Awesome!!! Plus, I think exploding would be so quick, it wouldn't be painful. I'm starting a forum for exploding monkeys, so I think any further talk about this exploding space monkey thingy should be moved to that forum.

      just toss Murderers into space, 1st Murderer in Space! lol

      And that is a human rights violation, unless they received capital punishment, but I don't think anyone would want to waste so much money on an execution on a proven fact.

      Anyway, back on topic.


        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick
      Berrybrick removed this reply because:
      Off topic after being asked to stop.
      15:39, January 26, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • Berrybrick
      Berrybrick removed this reply because:
      Off topic after being asked to stop.
      15:39, January 26, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • One of the new Iron Man 3 figs. Dunno which one, though.

      IronMan20131
        Loading editor
    • LEGO2013Helper wrote:

      One of the new Iron Man 3 figs. Dunno which one, though. <pic removed>

      The blue eyes might taking some getting used to. But the rest of the figure looks great :) Do you have a link to the original ebay page? ebay's been cited as the original place this was found, but I couldn't find the page...

        Loading editor
    • First post updated with new set images. Great job on the find LSHF :) There are some slightly larger images on Barnes and Noble, obtained by changing the 600 at the end of the URL to 1024 if anyone's interested, but they're not that much bigger, and can't see much of a point in re-uploading the images. I'm sure there would be hi-res images on there by putting in some magic number, but I've been unable to find it.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: First post updated with new set images. Great job on the find LSHF :) There are some slightly larger images on Barnes and Noble, obtained by changing the 600 at the end of the URL to 1024 if anyone's interested, but they're not that much bigger, and can't see much of a point in re-uploading the images. I'm sure there would be hi-res images on there by putting in some magic number, but I've been unable to find it.

      can you link the pages for the bigger pictures?

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: First post updated with new set images. Great job on the find LSHF :) There are some slightly larger images on Barnes and Noble, obtained by changing the 600 at the end of the URL to 1024 if anyone's interested, but they're not that much bigger, and can't see much of a point in re-uploading the images. I'm sure there would be hi-res images on there by putting in some magic number, but I've been unable to find it.

      can you link the pages for the bigger pictures?

      uploading them now (I forgot about upload by URL, makes things easier)

        Loading editor
    • They look okay I suppose. I am not too interested in getting any of them, but I'll probably wait for a review on the Extremis set.

        Loading editor
    • Ultimate Showdown: Eh...it looks....ok....for the price anyways.

      Extremis Harbor Battle: It looks decent.

      Malibu Mansion: the best set build-wise.

      I plan on getting the Extremis set (although the Malibu set is tempting), the small one is a skip.

      Also what the heck is with ADU guns, seriously why can't LEGO use a more realistic piece like the fire nozzle in the City sets or something....

        Loading editor
    • Guess I've got to put Stark's mansion back on my wishlist, because that's no mansion :/

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: Guess I've got to put Stark's mansion back on my wishlist, because that's no mansion :/

      So you want the set because it's not a mansion? :S

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Guess I've got to put Stark's mansion back on my wishlist, because that's no mansion :/

      So you want the set because it's not a mansion? :S

      He means that he wants to get a set that is actually Stark's Mansion.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: Guess I've got to put Stark's mansion back on my wishlist, because that's no mansion :/

      So you want the set because it's not a mansion? :S

      He means that he wants to get a set that is actually Stark's Mansion.

      Oh.

        Loading editor
    • Well, I decided to make my new sig --LSHF (Talk) | Super Villains resembling zombie Hagrid, there is such thing. Ironmanguy3. PS: You can upload pictures by URL?

        Loading editor
    • I don't know why that one doesn't work, but --LSHF (Talk) | Super Villains resembling zombie Hagrid, there is such thing. Ironmanguy3

        Loading editor
    • Sorry, but your signature should not be more than a line of text long.

        Loading editor
    • I fixed it, but I don't know why the nonworking one works now with my updated sig, and the second one didn't change.

        Loading editor
    • The Iron Man 3 sets looks great! The only thing I was hoping was for a bigger Stark maison, but it looks ok. Another thing that for me is pretty strange are the hair and the bear of the Mandarin: it's me or they are completely different from the movie? We'll see with better images of the minifig. Thanks for uploading the sets images :)

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord
      RaceLord removed this reply because:
      .
      01:57, February 9, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • MASTER SPECTRA wrote: WHY ARE ULTMATE SHOW DOWN SETS ALL $13.00 !?!?! FIRST HARRY POTTER THEN SUPER MAN NOW IRON MAN??? WAY TOO SMALL!!!!!!

      Caps much?

        Loading editor
    • I only really follow the Marvel Cinematic Universe, so haven't seen what the Mandarin looks like too much. Just thought that a hero who looked like Iron Man would have a much cooler looking arch-enemy, so a bit disappointed with the figure. Not that it's specifically LEGO's fault. And yes, I'm slightly devastated after seeing the final pics that there's absolutely no chance of a blue War Machine, dedicated Rescue suit or a Wasp, but there's always Iron Man 4 I guess :P

      Mark 42 Iron Man suit does look to me like a great figure though, it looks better in minifigure form than seeing the actual suit :D

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote: If they make him a toy Fair/ Comic con exclusive, i will be furious and hurt someone.

      Please don't. You will give our community an even worse name by doing that.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Djgourhan wrote: If they make him a toy Fair/ Comic con exclusive, i will be furious and hurt someone.

      Please don't. You will give our community an even worse name by doing that.

      LOL! Seriously, though, I will be furious if it's not released to the public.

        Loading editor
    • NOOOOOO!!!

        Loading editor
    • But still a good three solid sets..

        Loading editor
    • anyone asking "WHY!" Batgirl is yellow?MiniBatgirl

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote: anyone asking "WHY!" Batgirl is yellow?MiniBatgirl

      So people can know who there playing as if the made her black then she would look nearly the same as batman par the lips

      At least shes not pink :P

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord wrote: anyone asking "WHY!" Batgirl is yellow?MiniBatgirl

      Yellow is and has been her secondary color in the comics almost since she was introduced. The reason she is not black is because Batman has more black, so it makes more sense for his microfigure to be black and people need to be able to tell them apart at a moment's glance.

      Anyway, the microfigures look good except for Two-Face and Joker, but I still look forward to giving him to Harley. :P

        Loading editor
    • Could this be Zod's combat armor??
      Shadow assault armor

      Shadow Assault, hmm

        Loading editor
    • So, what do you guys think of the construction of War Machine's gun? (ref pic). I just built it up and put it on Iron Man- it looks alright to me, although I think it would've been good if the gun was just a tiny bit longer (but it's not as if that can be helped without a new piece)

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: So, what do you guys think of the construction of War Machine's gun? (ref pic). I just built it up and put it on Iron Man- it looks alright to me, although I think it would've been good if the gun was just a tiny bit longer (but it's not as if that can be helped without a new piece)

      the Gun should have been a new custom peice for War Machine

        Loading editor
    • RaceLord
      RaceLord removed this reply because:
      .
      04:36, February 19, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I built the gun and put it on my Iron Man, I think it's to small. So, what do you guys think of the Malibu Mansion? I'm not disappointed with it at all, I think it looks great!

        Loading editor
    • The mini-gun gets updated in IM3, so I can't say anything as to how accurate it looks. That aside I think it looks quit good.

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: What do you guys think of the Man Of Steel sets? The minifigures look pretty good and the Superman looks just fantastic!

        Loading editor
    • anyone else waiting for flash?

        Loading editor
    • Me .-.

        Loading editor
    • I know I am. :)

        Loading editor
    • 24.24.171.31 wrote: anyone else waiting for flash?

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I am, I want a Cyborg, Green Lantern, Nightwing, Batgirl, and Martian Manhunter!

        Loading editor
    • Same, all of them, I also think it'd be awesome for Red Hood, or if Robin/Tim Drake became Red Robin.

        Loading editor
    • THETHOMAS4 wrote: Same, all of them, I also think it'd be awesome for Red Hood, or if Robin/Tim Drake became Red Robin.

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Me too!

        Loading editor
    • Maybe even Damian wayne Robin.

        Loading editor
    • ...and this is why we have a separate wishlist thread

        Loading editor
    • Your kidding me right? Your not even asking us to talk over there? Your just talking sarcastically? Wow. No offence but it would be nice if you just asked us to switch over there. I'll move over to that thread. But next time at least ask, please?

        Loading editor
    • huh... I thought we had big notices on the first post of most rumour pages that wishlists and speculation belong on the other threads. It must have been some other ones. Sorry about that (and I'll put the notice in now).

      At the same time, I don't need any of your "attitude" either. People have been blocked on other forum sites for less. If I'm out of line, I'm happy to apologise and correct it, but not when the person pointing it out is being more sarcastic than I am in the first place (at least mine was unintentional)

        Loading editor
    • I just want to say: HAS ANYONE NOTICE HOW THE TUMBLER HAS STICKERS OF BANE'S MASK ON IT!!!! i mean i like bane, i was that version from the dark knight rises for Halloween, but really! sticker of his mask on the tumbler! No offense to Lego but that is just sad

        Loading editor
    • and i agree with ShyTy we should get gl sets

        Loading editor
    • THETHOMAS4 wrote: Maybe even Damian wayne Robin.

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Yes!

        Loading editor
    • 69.205.115.120 wrote: I just want to say: HAS ANYONE NOTICE HOW THE TUMBLER HAS STICKERS OF BANE'S MASK ON IT!!!! i mean i like bane, i was that version from the dark knight rises for Halloween, but really! sticker of his mask on the tumbler! No offense to Lego but that is just sad

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I know! That's so lame.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: huh... I thought we had big notices on the first post of most rumour pages that wishlists and speculation belong on the other threads. It must have been some other ones. Sorry about that (and I'll put the notice in now).

      At the same time, I don't need any of your "attitude" either. People have been blocked on other forum sites for less. If I'm out of line, I'm happy to apologise and correct it, but not when the person pointing it out is being more sarcastic than I am in the first place (at least mine was unintentional) </div

      Sorry...I just suffered a terrible loss and I'm pretty shaken up about it...from now on, lets stay on topic.
        Loading editor
    • WARNING: Possible Iron Man 3 spoiler


      So, turns out Stepahnie Szostak, who was widely rumoured to be playing Janet Van Dyke, will be playing Ellen Brandt, ie, some person I've never heard of. Makes me feel better about the IM3 sets and I'm not missing out on an opportunity to get a Wasp figure

        Loading editor
    • The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: Has anyone here built any custom Iron Man suits? When I get the sets I'm going to make Mark 5, the Space Suit, and whatever pieces I have leftover I'll just make some random suit.

        Loading editor
    • LEGO2013Helper wrote:

      One of the new Iron Man 3 figs. Dunno which one, though.

      IronMan20131

      The Ultimate Spinjitzu Master: I'm going to use this suit for my custom Mark 5. I'll use the torso, the legs, and the back helmet, and the War Machine visor.

        Loading editor
    • Ironpatriot1

      :O Judging by those posters, it looks like we'll be getting a blue War Machine suit :D

      I know they published an Avengers-style Nick Fury in the Avengers poster which never came out, but I think this is different- the suits in the posters (apart from this new one) appear in the poster even if they shouldn't. Neither War Machine armours should be in the posters in the first place if they were going to make a true copy of the posters. So this indicates to me that they're putting in every suit they've made to date in physical form in the photo.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote: :O Judging by those posters, it looks like we'll be getting a blue War Machine suit :D

      I know they published an Avengers-style Nick Fury in the Avengers poster which never came out, but I think this is different- the suits in the posters (apart from this new one) appear in the poster even if they shouldn't. Neither War Machine armours should be in the posters in the first place if they were going to make a true copy of the posters. So this indicates to me that they're putting in every suit they've made to date in physical form in the photo.

      I agree with your logic, i hope we get a physical Iron Patriot suit. We may get for the game preorder, a upcoming month promo, or Go forbid, a comic con exclusive.

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: :O Judging by those posters, it looks like we'll be getting a blue War Machine suit :D

      I know they published an Avengers-style Nick Fury in the Avengers poster which never came out, but I think this is different- the suits in the posters (apart from this new one) appear in the poster even if they shouldn't. Neither War Machine armours should be in the posters in the first place if they were going to make a true copy of the posters. So this indicates to me that they're putting in every suit they've made to date in physical form in the photo.

      I agree with your logic, i hope we get a physical Iron Patriot suit. We may get for the game preorder, a upcoming month promo, or Go forbid, a comic con exclusive.

      Go forbid? :p

        Loading editor
    • Djgourhan wrote:

      NightblazeSaber wrote: :O Judging by those posters, it looks like we'll be getting a blue War Machine suit :D

      I know they published an Avengers-style Nick Fury in the Avengers poster which never came out, but I think this is different- the suits in the posters (apart from this new one) appear in the poster even if they shouldn't. Neither War Machine armours should be in the posters in the first place if they were going to make a true copy of the posters. So this indicates to me that they're putting in every suit they've made to date in physical form in the photo.

      I agree with your logic, i hope we get a physical Iron Patriot suit. We may get for the game preorder, a upcoming month promo, or Go forbid, a comic con exclusive.

      I think they'd be a few too many angry people for it to be a Comic-Con exclusive. Or, it's possible he'll come in another set we don't know about (wishful thinking, I know :D). My bet's on the game preorder.

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber
      NightblazeSaber removed this reply because:
      100% unrelated
      22:52, April 12, 2013
      This reply has been removed
    • D: NOOOO! Maybe it'll be like the Chase McCain preorder. (Get the fig and the card for $1 :P)

        Loading editor
    • NightblazeSaber wrote:

      Ironpatriot1

      :O Judging by those posters, it looks like we'll be getting a blue War Machine suit :D

      I know they published an Avengers-style Nick Fury in the Avengers poster which never came out, but I think this is different- the suits in the posters (apart from this new one) appear in the poster even if they shouldn't. Neither War Machine armours should be in the posters in the first place if they were going to make a true copy of the posters. So this indicates to me that they're putting in every suit they've made to date in physical form in the photo.

      Where did you find that? Just wondering...

        Loading editor
    • Lego-dark-knight0518 wrote: Where did you find that? Just wondering...

      Iron Man 3 posters, you can find them here and here

        Loading editor
    • Unfortunately it's probably going to end up being like the Avengers poster version of Nick Fury :/ Although

        Loading editor
    • I didn't see that, but it pretty much confirms it. Although, There is a chance that they had access to a prototype Iron Patriot that was supposed to be in another set (Probably 76008).

        Loading editor
    • Jedi master sith wrote: Unfortunately it's probably going to end up being like the Avengers poster version of Nick Fury :/ Although

      ^This

      If anybody remembers, Fury was originally announced in the press release, but it seems like he was replaced with Iron Fist. Iron Patriot might have been designed, but they replaced him with War Machine or something in the final set and just reused the design for the poster.

        Loading editor
    • Berrybrick wrote:

      Jedi master sith wrote: Unfortunately it's probably going to end up being like the Avengers poster version of Nick Fury :/ Although

      ^This

      If anybody remembers, Fury was originally announced in the press release, but it seems like he was replaced with Iron Fist. Iron Patriot might have been designed, but they replaced him with War Machine or something in the final set and just reused the design for the poster.

      Aww. I really wanted an Iron Patriot :(

        Loading editor
    • Well, this said both were to appear.

        Loading editor
    • Legosuperheroesfan wrote: Well, this said both were to appear.

      Well, they could have mistaken the Mark 17 for the IP suit or they could have seen a polybag or something that hasn't been revealed to us yet.

      I really hope it's the second one.

        Loading editor