Hello everyone. I was just looking through the Class 5 articles list a bit ago and I noticed that nearly half of the pages there were part articles. Pages like this one are relatively easy to satisfactorily expand. All one has to do is give some basic data about the part: describe what it looks like and when it was released, list its appearances and link to a website like Peeron or Bricklink - and then it's Class 2-worthy! Creating part articles with an image and an otherwise blank infobox is very annoying, especially when I have no idea which sets that part came from and therefore cannot add the needed data.
As for creating normal articles, mainly ones that have not yet been released, please add a link to the source of the information. An example is 31003 Red Rotors. Without a source, we don't know if the article is based on valid data or not. So please, when creating legitimate pages, either create them into completion or give as much data as you can. In other words, try to create articles at a level that is Class 4 or better. Thanks, 04:08, November 8, 2012 (UTC)